2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive value of daily vs. retrospective well-being judgments in relationship stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Social Conflict Scale (“Acted in an unpleasant or angry way towards your partner”; Abbey & Andrews, ) is a five‐item subscale rated on a 5‐point scale ranging from 1 ( not at all) to 5 ( a great deal ). The seven‐item Partner‐Specific Rejecting Behaviors Scale (“I insulted my partner”; Murray, Griffin, Rose, & Bellavia, ) and the five‐item Interpersonal Qualities Scale (Oishi & Sullivan, ) were both rated on a 9‐point scale ranging from 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 9 (s trongly agree ). These measures have demonstrated good internal consistency and criterion validity, and they cohere as a single factor in prior research (Lambe et al, ; Mackinnon et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Social Conflict Scale (“Acted in an unpleasant or angry way towards your partner”; Abbey & Andrews, ) is a five‐item subscale rated on a 5‐point scale ranging from 1 ( not at all) to 5 ( a great deal ). The seven‐item Partner‐Specific Rejecting Behaviors Scale (“I insulted my partner”; Murray, Griffin, Rose, & Bellavia, ) and the five‐item Interpersonal Qualities Scale (Oishi & Sullivan, ) were both rated on a 9‐point scale ranging from 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 9 (s trongly agree ). These measures have demonstrated good internal consistency and criterion validity, and they cohere as a single factor in prior research (Lambe et al, ; Mackinnon et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, terms, such as ‘relationship satisfaction’ or ‘satisfying relationship’, used in previous research (e.g. Oishi & Sullivan, 2006), conflate two distinct components: one pertaining to attributes of the relationship itself and the other to the satisfaction derived from interactions in that relationship. The manner and extent to which these two components are related cannot be assumed, but require empirical assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to self-verification theory, people prefer to interact with others who confirm their self-views, even when those views are negative (see Swann, Rentfrow, & Guinn, 2003 for a review). People also feel more satisfied and stay in relationships longer when they and their partners have similar affective responses to life events (Anderson, Keltner, & John, 2003; Oishi & Sullivan, 2006) or similar interpersonal goals (Sanderson & Evans, 2001). These findings imply that people seek and enjoy social interactions with others who understand their subjective thoughts and feelings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%