2016
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential value of volume-based quantitative PET parameters and increased bone marrow uptake for the prediction of survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Abstract: The presence of distant metastasis is more predictive of survival than PET nodal status in MPM patients. PET/CT has the potential to provide prognostic information in MPM patients and there was a good correlation between overall survival and volume-based PET parameters. Determination of BM uptake may contribute toward the prediction of patient outcome with other quantitative PET parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Volume-based parameters such as TLG, which incorporate both total tumor volume and metabolic activity, can reflect changes throughout the entire tumor mass. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] As MPM spreads while generating specific features, including diffuse, complex, and inhomogeneous tumor geometry, TLG can provide significant additional information over the single-pixel analysis provided by SUVmax. We note here that TLG was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor in this current study and was carried over into the risk classification scoring system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…24 Volume-based parameters such as TLG, which incorporate both total tumor volume and metabolic activity, can reflect changes throughout the entire tumor mass. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] As MPM spreads while generating specific features, including diffuse, complex, and inhomogeneous tumor geometry, TLG can provide significant additional information over the single-pixel analysis provided by SUVmax. We note here that TLG was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor in this current study and was carried over into the risk classification scoring system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that each predictor we identified here had previously been individually reported as significant, but they have never been systematically combined and integrated into a new scoring system. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]33 After systematically considering our various predictors together, our prognosis system steadily emerged as shown in Figure 1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to offer a risk classification system that is able to comprehensively focus on the tumor environment of MPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent studies, NLR has been determined to be effective in the prediction of prognosis in MPM. 19 In the current study, the median survival time was determined as 23 months for those with SUVmax value <5 and as 13 months for those with SUVmax 5. 15,16 In another study, survival time was determined as 10.5 months in patients with NLR 3 and as 14.9 months in those with NLR <3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 There are studies which have defined a relationship between poor prognosis and bone marrow involvement and quantitative parameters calculated with PET/CT. 19 In the current study, the median survival time was determined as 23 months for those with SUVmax value <5 and as 13 months for those with SUVmax 5. The 1-and 5-year survival rates of patients with SUVmax value <5 were determined to be higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%