2017
DOI: 10.3390/socsci6010014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Scientist’s Dilemma: How the Masculine Framing of Science Shapes Friendships and Science Job Aspirations

Abstract: In the United States, girls and boys have similar science achievement, yet fewer girls aspire to science careers than boys. This paradox emerges in middle school, when peers begin to play a stronger role in shaping adolescent identities. We use complete network data from a single middle school and theories of gender, identity, and social distance to explore how friendship patterns might influence this gender and science paradox. Three patterns highlight the social dimensions of gendered science persistence: (1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, students were able to complete the survey in 25 minutes. In addition to the focal questions described in this study, there was an additional social network component of the survey instrument that asked youth about their friends and shared interest in science (Gauthier et al, 2017). The network data are not included in this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, students were able to complete the survey in 25 minutes. In addition to the focal questions described in this study, there was an additional social network component of the survey instrument that asked youth about their friends and shared interest in science (Gauthier et al, 2017). The network data are not included in this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friendship groups are highly segregated by gender ( Shrum et al 1988 ). Altogether, these social and cognitive processes and biases may influence science aspirations differently for boys and girls ( Gauthier et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Manterrupting , the other situations reported by women in this study may be considered subtle forms of sexism that over time accumulate and can lead to asymmetrical representation between men and women in work environments [28]. These situations do not occur separately: about 40% of participants quoted have already undergone more than one of the situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underestimation of the female gender in scientific activities is discussed by Gauthier et al [28], who says that this vision begins during the school phase, in which boys already have a socially constructed frame of the scientific and physical incapacity of the girls. Additionally, the authors suggest that teachers often reinforce these stereotypes of girls as less skilled in math and science, validating the view of inferiority between the sexes [28]. Thus, this concept of intellectual inferiority permeates throughout the ontogenetic development of adolescents and is expressed in several spheres in their lives, such as their professional life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%