2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of oral vaccines for disease control in wildlife species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideal qualities for a practical wildlife vaccine include that the vaccine is stable, the delivered material is safe and remains effective in conjunction with the baiting system of choice, and the deployed baited vaccine has a high uptake rate in the target species (Cross et al, 2007a). Most commonly for oral wildlife vaccines, the vaccine itself is delivered inside a separate bait, as is the case with existing rabies and classical swine fever wildlife vaccines (Kaden et al, 2003;Blackwell et al, 2004), as well as prototypical vaccines for plague (Creekmore et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ideal qualities for a practical wildlife vaccine include that the vaccine is stable, the delivered material is safe and remains effective in conjunction with the baiting system of choice, and the deployed baited vaccine has a high uptake rate in the target species (Cross et al, 2007a). Most commonly for oral wildlife vaccines, the vaccine itself is delivered inside a separate bait, as is the case with existing rabies and classical swine fever wildlife vaccines (Kaden et al, 2003;Blackwell et al, 2004), as well as prototypical vaccines for plague (Creekmore et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination of wildlife is one means of controlling Tb, but vaccines applied to wildlife species are most expediently delivered as oral vaccines (Cross et al, 2007a). Examples where this approach has proved successful in reducing disease prevalence include oral rabies vaccination programs among mesocarnivores in Europe and North America (Rupprecht et al, 2004) and oral vaccination against classical swine fever among wild boar in northern Europe (Blome et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral vaccination offers a prospective tool for controlling a variety of wildlife diseases (Cross et al 2007;Artois et al 2011). The most notable successes with wildlife vaccination have been the European and North American campaigns against rabies (Cross et al 2007;Sterner et al 2009;Artois et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most notable successes with wildlife vaccination have been the European and North American campaigns against rabies (Cross et al 2007;Sterner et al 2009;Artois et al 2011). Mass oral vaccination of wildlife relies on availability of effective immunogens and suitable bait delivery technology (Cross et al 2007;Artois et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To manage the disease more effectively, we need to understand the potential role of all these factors, including any synergistic effects. We also need to recognize that their relative importance is likely to vary between different areas because of differences in host-community composition and abundance, husbandry practices, landscape factors [56] and climatic conditions, which might affect the survival of bacilli in the environment [57].Vaccination might provide some assistance in the control of bTB in host communities in Britain in the future [58,59], but this as yet untested approach should not be seen as the answer to the bTB problem. Although a badger vaccine might well contribute considerably to our ability to control bTB in the future, history has taught us that there are no 'silver bullets' when it comes to bTB eradication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%