2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0152-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
197
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
3
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, more species‐specific data, especially involving molecular analyses, are being generated as restoration science progresses (e.g. Breed et al ). When molecular data are available, using population boundaries (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, more species‐specific data, especially involving molecular analyses, are being generated as restoration science progresses (e.g. Breed et al ). When molecular data are available, using population boundaries (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic analyses of single species, although important, do not capture the larger patterns occurring within an interacting community of plants. Trancriptome profiling or genome sequencing of multiple species and individuals within a community will open new, integrative avenues of analyses and allow us to address existing questions that require sampling of floras and communities (Bragg et al, 2015;Fitzpatrick and Keller, 2015;Bowsher et al, 2017;Han et al, 2017;Swenson and Jones, 2017;Zambrano et al, 2017;Matthews et al, 2018;Subrahmaniam et al, 2018;Breed et al, 2019) . This is especially true for understanding responses to climate change where community level analyses are needed to capture the interacting dynamics of different species responses (Liu et al, 2018;Komatsu et al, 2019;Snell et al, 2019) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In highly modified landscapes the genetic integrity of many species has been compromised, and local-provenancing can favour the selection of genetically depauperate and maladapted seed (Jones, 2013). Also, local-provenancing gives little consideration to the persistence of plantings under future climates, with growing evidence that genotypes from non-local sources may outperform those sourced locally (Hoffmann et al , 2015; Prober et al , 2015; Breed et al , 2019). In addition, foundation species are especially important during the restoration process because their genetic variation can shape the networks of ecological interaction influencing community assembly, stability, and evolution (Gibson et al , 2012; Lau et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%