2006
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Impact of Male Circumcision on HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: BackgroundA randomized controlled trial (RCT) has shown that male circumcision (MC) reduces sexual transmission of HIV from women to men by 60% (32%−76%; 95% CI) offering an intervention of proven efficacy for reducing the sexual spread of HIV. We explore the implications of this finding for the promotion of MC as a public health intervention to control HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.Methods and FindingsUsing dynamical simulation models we consider the impact of MC on the relative prevalence of HIV in men and women… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
209
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
209
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Already mathematical modelling suggests that in the medium term the proportion of people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa who are women may rise as male circumcision programmes are scaled up in high HIV prevalence settings, due to the lag time for indirect effects for women to be felt. 45 The fact that, other than an increase in the number of sexual acts by the circumcised arm in the Orange Farm study, risk enhancement was not striking in any of the three trials is not reassuring enough. None of the trial participants were told that male circumcision provided any degree of protection against HIV -in fact they were told that the trials were being conducted to find this out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Already mathematical modelling suggests that in the medium term the proportion of people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa who are women may rise as male circumcision programmes are scaled up in high HIV prevalence settings, due to the lag time for indirect effects for women to be felt. 45 The fact that, other than an increase in the number of sexual acts by the circumcised arm in the Orange Farm study, risk enhancement was not striking in any of the three trials is not reassuring enough. None of the trial participants were told that male circumcision provided any degree of protection against HIV -in fact they were told that the trials were being conducted to find this out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The predictive modelling provided so far suggests potential effectiveness by using efficacy figures only, 29 and usually using the Orange Farm figure rather than the lower average of all three trials. This is not strong when compared with male condoms, with efficacy of 80-90%.…”
Section: The Medical Literature On Male Circumcisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En effet, au Zimbabwe, Swaziland, Botswana, Afrique du Sud, Lesotho et Namibie, où la prévalence actuelle du VIH chez les adultes est supérieure à 20 %, le taux d'hommes circoncis est inférieur à 40 %. Au Bénin, Sénégal, Cameroun, Kenya et en République Démocratique du Congo, où la prévalence actuelle du VIH chez les adultes est inférieure à 6 %, le taux d'hommes circoncis est supérieur à 80 % [1,4]. Ces constatations coïncident avec les données d'une étude écologique, publiée en 1989 [5], qui établissait à l'échelle des populations africaines une corrélation entre le taux de circoncision et la prévalence du VIH.…”
Section: Serait-elle Réalisable ?unclassified
“…La généralisation de la circoncision en Afrique subsaharienne permettrait d'éviter de 1 à 4 millions de nouvelles infections et de 200 000 à 500 000 décès dans les 10 premières années puis de 2 à 8 millions de nouvelles infections et de 2 à 5 millions de décès supplémentaires au terme des 10 années suivantes [4]. Son impact serait donc considérable.…”
Section: Quel En Serait L'impact ?unclassified