1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-1157(83)80008-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potency of bovine PPD tuberculins in guinea-pigs and in tuberculous cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paterson recommends that guinea pigs be used for the control at preparation with occasional check assays in cattle but that if the type of tuberculin is changed or if a change in character is suspected that appeal must be to the assay in cattle [66]. Changes in manufacturing and production procedures may also result in fluctuations in tuberculin potency and there may also be considerable variability in potency between batches of tuberculin, including those produced in the same centre [83, 85, 86]. Tuberculin potency fluctuation was seen during 1990–1992 associated with Good Laboratory Practice adaptations and in 2000 associated with changes instigated as a consequence of EU requirements in relation to Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (unpublished observations—DAFF records).…”
Section: Tuberculin Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paterson recommends that guinea pigs be used for the control at preparation with occasional check assays in cattle but that if the type of tuberculin is changed or if a change in character is suspected that appeal must be to the assay in cattle [66]. Changes in manufacturing and production procedures may also result in fluctuations in tuberculin potency and there may also be considerable variability in potency between batches of tuberculin, including those produced in the same centre [83, 85, 86]. Tuberculin potency fluctuation was seen during 1990–1992 associated with Good Laboratory Practice adaptations and in 2000 associated with changes instigated as a consequence of EU requirements in relation to Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (unpublished observations—DAFF records).…”
Section: Tuberculin Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, the use of A60 as a new tuberculin presents the following advantages, with respect to conventional PPD, for cutaneous testing in tuberculosis: a) a single electrophoretic component in the case of A60 [5] instead of a series of polymers differing in relative concentrations for different PPD preparations [ 13,23]; b) a spectrophotometric determination of A60 [5], which contrasts with the error-prone and subjective titration of PPD by biological methods [14,16,21,29]; and c) an approximately tenfold higher potency, which makes it possible to lower proportionally the amount of injected reagent in cutaneous testing. In addition, the observed instability of PPD preparations, presumably due to the presence of proteolytic enzymes, is likely to be suppressed in the case of A60 preparations, which are quite stable in lyophilized form or in solution at low temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compulsory cutaneous testing for bovine tuberculosis is carried out by intradermal injection of the bovine tuberculin purified protein derivative (bovine tuberculin-PPD), which is a steamsterilized culture filtrate extract of Mycobacterium boris. Likewise, the same type of extracts from Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (johnin-PPD) or Mycobacterium avium (avian tuberculin-PPD) are used as reagents in cutaneous testing for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) [1,2]. Because of the genetic and immunological kinship of M. paratuberculosis and M. avium, the former organism is frequently replaced by the latter (which is more easy to cultivate), in the preparation of sensitins (tuberculin-like preparations) used for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%