1965
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(65)80031-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The post-cricoid impression on the oesophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At dissection no mass could be found and they contended that the mass seen represented a PC impression due to a venous plexus as described by Pitman and Fraser [3]. Clements et al [7] reported fluoroscopic findings of webs, cricopharyngeal bars, and the PC impression in 100 patients with varying gastrointestinal complaints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At dissection no mass could be found and they contended that the mass seen represented a PC impression due to a venous plexus as described by Pitman and Fraser [3]. Clements et al [7] reported fluoroscopic findings of webs, cricopharyngeal bars, and the PC impression in 100 patients with varying gastrointestinal complaints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 1965, Pitman and Fraser [3] described an impression of the barium stream in the posterior cricoid region in 104 barium studies. They termed this the posterior cricoid (PC) impression and felt that it represented a submucosal venous plexus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations