1980
DOI: 10.1016/0161-4630(80)90055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The possible mode of action of prostaglandins: XVI. A study to assess the local effect of prostaglandins E1, E2 OR F2α in the regulation of male fertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prostaglandin E and prostaglandin F have been shown to affect sperm metabolism and functions (Breitbart et al 1995; Herrero et al 1997; Kelly & Critchley, 1997), and enhance the contractility of the smooth muscle layer surrounding the epididymal tubule (Hib & Oscar, 1978; Cosentino et al 1984). Intratesticular injection of prostaglandins (Rej & Chatterjee, 1980) or Silastic implants bearing indomethacin (Ratnasooriya & Wadsworth, 1987) have been shown to suppress fertility in rats by mechanisms not entirely known. Our present experiments demonstrated that among the prostanoids tested, only PGE 2 , and to a much lesser extent PGF 2α , stimulate electrogenic anion secretion (driving force for water secretion) by the epididymis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prostaglandin E and prostaglandin F have been shown to affect sperm metabolism and functions (Breitbart et al 1995; Herrero et al 1997; Kelly & Critchley, 1997), and enhance the contractility of the smooth muscle layer surrounding the epididymal tubule (Hib & Oscar, 1978; Cosentino et al 1984). Intratesticular injection of prostaglandins (Rej & Chatterjee, 1980) or Silastic implants bearing indomethacin (Ratnasooriya & Wadsworth, 1987) have been shown to suppress fertility in rats by mechanisms not entirely known. Our present experiments demonstrated that among the prostanoids tested, only PGE 2 , and to a much lesser extent PGF 2α , stimulate electrogenic anion secretion (driving force for water secretion) by the epididymis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies on human sperm function have shown that addition of PGE-2 to human semen samples increased the motility and ovum-penetrating ability of the spermatozoa (Aitken & Kelly, 1985). While most of the above-cited data indicate that seminal PGs enhance male fertility, some animal studies have shown that intrascrotal or intratesticular deposition of high doses of PGEs or PGF-2ot induce temporary sterility in rats and rabbits, probably by impairment of spermatogenesis (Saksena, Lau & Chang, 1978;Saksena & Lau, 1979;Rej & Chatterjee, 1980). While most of the above-cited data indicate that seminal PGs enhance male fertility, some animal studies have shown that intrascrotal or intratesticular deposition of high doses of PGEs or PGF-2ot induce temporary sterility in rats and rabbits, probably by impairment of spermatogenesis (Saksena, Lau & Chang, 1978;Saksena & Lau, 1979;Rej & Chatterjee, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly intratesticular injection of 2.5 mg/kg of PGE l , or PGE 2 affects the capacity of fertilizing of epididymal spermatozoa in male rats. Instead, no effects on male rat fertility were reported for PGF 2α , despite suppressing the testis and epididymis weight [35]. Both PGs of the E series (PGE 1 and PGE 2 ) did not have any local effect on epididymal spermatozoa fertilizing capacity, despite reducing the weight of the injected testis due to blood flow restriction at the site of application.…”
Section: Findings From Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Both PGs of the E series (PGE 1 and PGE 2 ) did not have any local effect on epididymal spermatozoa fertilizing capacity, despite reducing the weight of the injected testis due to blood flow restriction at the site of application. Considering that PGs suppress steroidogenesis by lowering the plasma levels of androgens, the incapacity of PGs to affect the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa in both injected and contralateral sides suggests that the androgen that has been available following the treatment schedule was enough to keep the fertilizing capacity of the epididymal spermatozoa despite of the PGs site of injection [35]. However, intratesticular injection of higher doses of PGs (2.5 mg/kg) adversely affected the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa, by affecting steroidogenesis in both the injected and contralateral control testes [35].…”
Section: Findings From Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation