2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Possibility of Using Public Transport In Rural Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of increasing competition in passenger transport [2], it is necessary to look for ways of making public transport more attractive to passengers. The leading indicator is the overall time spent traveling between two points.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Used To Compile Final Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence of increasing competition in passenger transport [2], it is necessary to look for ways of making public transport more attractive to passengers. The leading indicator is the overall time spent traveling between two points.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Used To Compile Final Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of public passenger transport quality assessment, to a certain extent, has already been addressed in several publications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Nevertheless, results of these studies point only to partial evaluations of the quality of individual transport sections, while there is lack of reference and link to the individual timetable evaluations as a whole.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the evaluation process, the individual flights and connections at the airports are assessed, not the quality of the connection between point A and point B. [6,7] The case study in this paper is based on Václav Havel Airport Prague situated in the Central Bohemian Region. The specific routes (26 routes/destinations) were selected for the demonstration of the proposed assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%