2009
DOI: 10.1080/09500690802650055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Positive and Negative Effects of Science Concept Tests on Student Conceptual Understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have indicated that multiple-choice questions have certain limitations and drawbacks in that they do not provide deep insights into the conceptual understanding of students (Rollnick & Mahooana, 1999). For example, it is very difficult to develop multiple-choice test items that assess higher cognitive skills (Chang, Yeh, & Barufaldi, 2010;Miller, 1988). However, higher-level learning, such as integration, reasoning, and problem-solving abilities, is highly dependent on domainspecific prior knowledge (Chen et al, 2006;Scheiter et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have indicated that multiple-choice questions have certain limitations and drawbacks in that they do not provide deep insights into the conceptual understanding of students (Rollnick & Mahooana, 1999). For example, it is very difficult to develop multiple-choice test items that assess higher cognitive skills (Chang, Yeh, & Barufaldi, 2010;Miller, 1988). However, higher-level learning, such as integration, reasoning, and problem-solving abilities, is highly dependent on domainspecific prior knowledge (Chen et al, 2006;Scheiter et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, open-ended questions that elicit constructed responses and give students a higher degree of freedom in reasoning may be a better foundation to evaluate higher-order thinking (Chang, & Barufaldi, 2010;Ilhan, Sozbilir, Sekerci, & Yildirim, 2015;Wang, Chang, & Li, 2008;Yeh et al, 2012). Many studies also note that it is difficult to develop multiple-choice test items to assess higher cognitive skills Hsiao et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can develop test items with good deception based on student answer choices. Therefore, Tarman & Kuran (2015) suggested combining interview and multiple-choice test as an ideal instrument to identify students' understanding in the assessment process Moreover, Bassett (2016) and Chang et al (2010) affirmed that multiple-choice tests have various weaknesses as follows: (1) guessing can cause errors on variances and break down reliability;…”
Section: Simple Multiple-choice Testmentioning
confidence: 99%