The populist style and public diplomacy: kayfabe as performative agonism in Trump’s Twitter posts

Abstract

This article theorises the interplay between public diplomacy and populism. Building on Baudrillard’s simulacra, we advance the hybridity approach to soft power statecraft by analysing a cultural shift in US presidential public diplomacy. Using discourse analysis, we uncover how, rather than aiding the building of relationship with foreign publics, Donald Trump has brought to the field cultural codes alien to public diplomacy, imploding the meanings central to the endogenous norms of diplomacy and turning towards an agonistic relational dynamic with foreign publics. This article reveals how digitalisation affords the expansion of Donald Trump’s populist style, and makes the populist cultural shift highly visible on his Twitter. To reveal this dynamic in granular detail, we propose ‘kayfabe’ as an epistemic lens for the interpretation of the populist style in the conduct of Trump’s ‘simulated public diplomacy’, a defining feature of the current US global leadership. As well as considering socialities re-shaping relational dynamics, this article unpacks tensions stemming from the expansion of populist style into presidential public diplomacy. Finally, we reflect on the epistemic crisis of US public diplomacy within the strategic landscape of political uncertainties associated with the proliferation of populism in the field.

Political public relations within foreign affairs: Ireland’s public diplomacy campaign for a security council seat

“…First, it elucidates the practice of political public relations within the UN, a vast and complex arena for foreign political maneuvering. Traditional public diplomacy scholarship largely addresses foreign stakeholder engagement by states in unilateral or comparative contexts (Albishri, et al, 2019; Golan et al, 2018, 2019; Gershman and Zaharna, 2005; Hayden, 2013; Surowiec and Miles, 2020). To the contrary, new public diplomacy scholarship increasingly addresses the role of non-state actors in foreign stakeholder engagement on behalf, or in spite of, nation-states (Amiri and Sevin, 2020; Brinkerhoff, 2019; Kochhar, 2018; Li et al, 2019 Pamment, 2013).…”

“…Public diplomacy is an established area of research informed by the fields of public relations, political marketing, international relations, diplomatic and peace studies, and law, among others (Cull, 2019; Golan et al, 2019). Chief among public diplomacy’s many functions is understanding how nation-states leverage communications to influence foreign audiences to perceive, think, or behave in ways that benefit their foreign policy interests (Surowiec and Miles, 2020). A key way states develop messages that seek such influence is through effective storytelling, or the art of relaying tales and anecdotes through theatrics and imagery.…”

Real-Time Twitter Data Analysis: A Survey

“…Favorites: To add a Tweet to your favorites, click the yellow icon next to the tweet. Tweets you've favorite will stay in your list until you delete them [15].…”

Commentary—Much ado About Something Else. Donald Trump, the US Stock Market, and the Public Interest Ethics of Social Media Communication

“…Trump's Twitter feed has become a primary source of key pronouncements on political (Kreis, 2017), foreign (Boucher & Thies, 2019), and economic (Tillmann, 2020) policy issues, with relevant implications for stock markets (Cervantes & Rambaud, 2020). Such online activity mostly consisted of an apparently un-filtered, impulsive response to news and events by the President himself, bypassing the advice of communication experts and political staff (Surowiec & Miles, 2021).…”