Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2003
DOI: 10.1080/0958493032000123380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘poor man’s mobile telephone': accessversuspossession to control the information gap in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A handful of multinational corporations (MNCs) monopolized the market, with expensive switches that were unsuitable for India’s tropical climate (Mani, 1989; Srinivasan, 2010). For much of this period, the telephone network of India remained ineffective in providing quality service to users, and with a national tele-density rate (telephone lines per 100 inhabitants) of only 0.3%, India lagged behind other low-income countries across Asia and Africa (O’Neill, 2003; Ray & Ray, 2010; Saha, 2004). Customers experienced poor service quality and long waiting lists for telecommunications service installation because of the triple constraints of highly priced electromagnetic foreign exchanges, mismatch between products designed for foreign urban traffic and Indian requirements, and lack of capacity for designing domestic telecommunications equipment (Malerba & Mani, 2009; Mani, 2005).…”
Section: Findings: C-dotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of multinational corporations (MNCs) monopolized the market, with expensive switches that were unsuitable for India’s tropical climate (Mani, 1989; Srinivasan, 2010). For much of this period, the telephone network of India remained ineffective in providing quality service to users, and with a national tele-density rate (telephone lines per 100 inhabitants) of only 0.3%, India lagged behind other low-income countries across Asia and Africa (O’Neill, 2003; Ray & Ray, 2010; Saha, 2004). Customers experienced poor service quality and long waiting lists for telecommunications service installation because of the triple constraints of highly priced electromagnetic foreign exchanges, mismatch between products designed for foreign urban traffic and Indian requirements, and lack of capacity for designing domestic telecommunications equipment (Malerba & Mani, 2009; Mani, 2005).…”
Section: Findings: C-dotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of India illustrates another possible scenario, where the attraction of corDECT has been widely acknowledged as the 'poor man's mobile phone', and whose total subscription increased from about 100,000 in September 2001 to 7.55 million in March 2004 (Department of Telecommunications, 2003-4;O'Neill, 2003).This impressive, but still smaller, scale of growth as compared with Little Smart was achieved under the condition that India's telecom authorities were much more supportive of this limited mobility service than their Chinese counterparts.While the Ministry of Information Industry was trying to curb Little Smart growth, the Indian Department of Telecommunications issued its guidelines endorsing corDECT in 2001 with an explicit goal in enhancing universal service (McDowell and Lee, 2003). However, the institutional framework for telecom policymaking is less centralized in India than it is in China.…”
Section: A Premature Decline?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the institutional framework for telecom policymaking is less centralized in India than it is in China. Subsequently, mobile operators in India were able to launch a legal challenge against the right of landline operators to provide a limited mobility service (O'Neill, 2003), something China Mobile and China Unicom were unable to do. Given the lower average income in India, the market demand was also smaller.…”
Section: A Premature Decline?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a full review of these approaches is beyond the scope of this article, these include regulatory levers, such as South Africa's phone shop requirement, flexible franchise models for rural GSM service (Engvall & Hesselmark 2004), and the pursuit of alternative satellite or WiFi/WiMAX technologies to support rural/remote connectivity (O'Neill 2003). These solutions require skillful collaboration between and integration with existing services so as to best balance the needs of all stakeholders.…”
Section: Telephone Non-usersmentioning
confidence: 99%