“…Kernel weight showed positive and significant correlations with nut length ( r = 0.45), nut width ( r = 0.68), nut weight ( r = 0.83), kernel length ( r = 0.59), and kernel width ( r = 0.50), and agreed with others (Bayazit, 2012; Gahsemi et al, 2012; Cosmulescu & Botu, 2012; Mahmoodi et al., 2016; Poggetti et al., 2017; Khadivi et al, 2019b; Akça et al., 2020). Kernel percentage was negatively and significantly correlated with shell thickness ( r = ‐ 0.30), shell hardness ( r = ‐ 0.42), ease of kernel removal from nuts ( r = ‐ 0.39), and kernel shriveling ( r = ‐ 0.20), while it was positively and significantly correlated with kernel length ( r = 0.17), kernel width ( r = 0.30), kernel weight ( r = 0.50), kernel filled ( r = 0.46), and kernel plumpness ( r = 0.41) and was in line with the previous findings (Sharma & Sharma, 1998; Cosmulescu & Botu, 2012; Khadivi et al., 2019a,b; Khadivi‐Khub, 2014; Khadivi‐Khub et al., 2015a,b.…”