2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pomological characterization of walnut (Juglans regia L.) to select the superior genotypes – An opportunity for genetic improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruit height varied from 34.35 to 45.14 mm. These values are consistent with Mahmoodi et al, (2019), but are lower than Khadivi et al, (2019). Nut width is worthy for growers who accept a minimum grade of 32.0 mm, and bigger nut diameter means more income for growers.…”
Section: Morphometric and Phenological Characterssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Fruit height varied from 34.35 to 45.14 mm. These values are consistent with Mahmoodi et al, (2019), but are lower than Khadivi et al, (2019). Nut width is worthy for growers who accept a minimum grade of 32.0 mm, and bigger nut diameter means more income for growers.…”
Section: Morphometric and Phenological Characterssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, these key variables are the main traits accounting for kernel percentage, and they should be considered together in breeding with aiming increasing kernel percentage. Significant regression associations between kernel percentage and nut and kernel weights have been previously reported with MRA in walnut (Khadivi et al., 2019a; Khadivi‐Khub et al., 2015a, b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Kernel weight showed positive and significant correlations with nut length ( r = 0.45), nut width ( r = 0.68), nut weight ( r = 0.83), kernel length ( r = 0.59), and kernel width ( r = 0.50), and agreed with others (Bayazit, 2012; Gahsemi et al, 2012; Cosmulescu & Botu, 2012; Mahmoodi et al., 2016; Poggetti et al., 2017; Khadivi et al, 2019b; Akça et al., 2020). Kernel percentage was negatively and significantly correlated with shell thickness ( r = ‐ 0.30), shell hardness ( r = ‐ 0.42), ease of kernel removal from nuts ( r = ‐ 0.39), and kernel shriveling ( r = ‐ 0.20), while it was positively and significantly correlated with kernel length ( r = 0.17), kernel width ( r = 0.30), kernel weight ( r = 0.50), kernel filled ( r = 0.46), and kernel plumpness ( r = 0.41) and was in line with the previous findings (Sharma & Sharma, 1998; Cosmulescu & Botu, 2012; Khadivi et al., 2019a,b; Khadivi‐Khub, 2014; Khadivi‐Khub et al., 2015a,b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphological markers are practical, so they have been applied in breeding programs to study genetic diversity (Barros et al, 2019;Mangosongo et al, 2019;Shahid et al, 2019;Piña et al, 2010); selection outstanding hybrids (Khadivi et al, 2019), and interspecific hybrids evaluation (Santos et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%