2011
DOI: 10.1177/097152151101800304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Form in Dalit Fiction

Abstract: This article examines two Dalit novels, Bama’s Sangati and Sivakami’s The Grip of Change. It argues that the two novels hybridise the very novel form through the appropriation of different registers, the mythic, the historical and the immediate. It argues that this narrative hybridisation is a political project, reflecting a radicalisation of consciousness itself. Bama and Sivakami, I argue further, transform folkloric and local-mythic language and narrative by infusing into it the language of rights, Ambedkar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way Bama rewrites the ‘novel’ is by using non-literary and non-standardised storytelling forms such ‘oppaari’ (dirge), ‘kulavai’ (ululation), ‘chellaangucchi’ (village game) and ‘roraaathu’ (lullaby). ‘ Sangati is built around women’s conversations—events are narrated through women’s stories and opinions delivered through them, a feature that produces a ‘dramatized audience’ that foregrounds the experience of specific Dalit Women’ (Nayar, 2011, pp. 369–370).…”
Section: Orality/memory Against Textuality/historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way Bama rewrites the ‘novel’ is by using non-literary and non-standardised storytelling forms such ‘oppaari’ (dirge), ‘kulavai’ (ululation), ‘chellaangucchi’ (village game) and ‘roraaathu’ (lullaby). ‘ Sangati is built around women’s conversations—events are narrated through women’s stories and opinions delivered through them, a feature that produces a ‘dramatized audience’ that foregrounds the experience of specific Dalit Women’ (Nayar, 2011, pp. 369–370).…”
Section: Orality/memory Against Textuality/historymentioning
confidence: 99%