2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation

Abstract: Literature on co-production is booming. Yet, most literature is aspirational and methodological in nature, focusing on why coproduction is important for environmental governance and knowledge production and how it should be done, and does not address the question why these processes often fail to achieve stated objectives of empowerment and societal transformation. In this review, we address this gap by reviewing literature on the political and power dimensions of co-production. Our review shows how depolitici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
364
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
364
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency of discourses to reproduce themselves calls for sensitivity to power dynamics in environmental assessment and planning during the bridging and co-production of knowledge (Turnhout et al 2019a(Turnhout et al , 2019b. This sensitivity should lead to the creation of shared understandings of both the social and ecological dimensions of resource management contexts and to the inclusion of a legitimate and relational understanding of NCP and PCN (Chan et al 2012).…”
Section: Knowledge and Worldviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency of discourses to reproduce themselves calls for sensitivity to power dynamics in environmental assessment and planning during the bridging and co-production of knowledge (Turnhout et al 2019a(Turnhout et al , 2019b. This sensitivity should lead to the creation of shared understandings of both the social and ecological dimensions of resource management contexts and to the inclusion of a legitimate and relational understanding of NCP and PCN (Chan et al 2012).…”
Section: Knowledge and Worldviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, an integrated approach still has challenges of other co-production applications. For example, the constraints of research design can conflict with stakeholder goals, and failure to address unequal power dynamics among researchers and stakeholders can undermine the process (Turnhout et al, 2020), potentially yielding design outputs not robust for either group's goals.…”
Section: Benefits Challenges and Applications Of An Integrated Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still a challenge of an integrated approach; however, the focus of a trait-based approach on characteristics rather than species creates more flexibility Unequal power dynamics can undermine the process and outcomes (Turnhout, Metze, Wyborn, Klenk, & Louder, 2020), potentially yielding design outputs that are not robust for either group's goals Still a challenge of an integrated approach communities, restoring to a native reference ecosystem may not be ecologically, economically, or logistically feasible, and thus restoring ecosystem services or functions may be preferable. In these cases, co-designing research interventions using a trait-based approach can improve inclusion of indigenous and local knowledge and locally relevant species while still producing generalizable results.…”
Section: Constraints Of Research Design Can Conflict With Stakeholdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary teams: Full-spectrum sustainability demands interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approaches but, as others have noted (Turnhout et al 2020), transdisciplinary and coproductive research is a major challenge because of institutional constraints, stove-piped/ siloed disciplinary cultures, power relations, and fragmented societal/industry values and interests.…”
Section: Looking Forward: Future Challenges Of Sustainability?mentioning
confidence: 99%