The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city

Abstract

Everyday surveillance work is increasingly performed by non-human algorithms. These entities can be conceptualised as machinic flâneurs that engage in distanciated flânerie: subjecting urban flows to a dispassionate, calculative and expansive gaze. This paper provides some theoretical reflections on the nascent forms of algorithmic practice materialising in two Australian cities, and some of their implications for urban relations and social justice. It looks at the idealisation – and operational black boxing – of automated watching programs, before considering their impacts on notions such as ‘the right to the city’ and ‘the right to the face’. It will argue that the turn to facial recognition software for the purposes of automating urban governance reconstitutes the meanings and phenomenology of the face. In particular, the fleshly and communicative physicality of the face is reduced to a measurable object that can be identified by a virtualised referent and then consequently tracked. Moreover, the asymmetrical and faceless nature of these machinic programs of recognition unsettles conventional notions of civil inattention and bodily sovereignty, and the prioritisation given to pattern recognition renders them amenable to ideas/ideals from phrenology and physiognomy. In this way, algorithmic governance may generate not only forms of facial vulnerability and estrangement, but also facial artifice, where individuals come to develop tacit and artful ways of de-facing and re-facing in order to subvert the processes of recognition which leverage these modes of biopower. Thus, the datafication of urban governance gives rise to a dynamic biopolitics of the face.

Autoridades interpretativas: una perspectiva teórica sobre datificación y producción de sentido

“…ej., Van Eeten y Mueller, 2013); gobernanza por infraestructura (DeNardis y Musiani, 2016); moderación de contenidos, acceso, derechos, políticas de impacto internacional sobre contenidos y copyright (Powell, 2012); gobernanza de plataformas (p. ej., Gillespie, 2017;Smith, 2020).…”

Smart City Configurations: A Conceptual Approach to Assess Smart City Practices and Outcomes

“…Automation helps to create efficiency in that processes do not have to be consciously re-produced again and again. At the same time, a high degree of automation is often problematized as resulting in 'black boxes' which limit a system's transparency and accountability as well as the possibility for reflective thought [35]. Accordingly, the relevant qualities captured in the automation dimensions are:…”

La transparencia y la no discriminación en el Estado de bienestar digital

“…Siguiendo una línea similar, Gavin J.D. Smith (2020) se cuestiona cómo las políticas públicas de vigilancia basadas en algoritmos afectan el derecho a la ciudad y el derecho al rostro. Por su parte, tomando un marco teórico de los estudios críticos de los datos, Joanna Redden analiza las prácticas estatales canadienses que descansan en big data, generando un mapeo de las políticas públicas que basadas en datos e identificando cuáles son los principales efectos negativos identificados.…”