The politics and ethics of academia in the Covid-19 era: A view from Canada

Chaufan, Claudia; Hemsing, Natalie

doi:10.31235/osf.io/hvxpc

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There exists, to be sure, ample research on the perceived problem of "suboptimal" vaccine uptake or of vaccine hesitancy among HCWs, in Canada and elsewhere. As has been noted, most of this research, implicitly or explicitly, overwhelmingly endorses full and continuing vaccination for HCWs, if necessary through mandates (Chaufan et al, 2024). And there is little doubt that the policy of mandated vaccination has succeeded in increasing vaccination rates among HCWs (Lee et al, 2022;Poyiadji et al, 2022;Ritter et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Covid-19 vaccination decisions and impacts of vaccine mandates: A cross sectional survey of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada

Chaufan,

Hemsing,

Moncrieffe

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSince vaccination policies were introduced in the healthcare sector in the province of Ontario, Canada, most establishments implemented vaccination or termination requirements, with most enforcing them to this day. Researchers have shown a strong interest in the perceived problem of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers, yet not in their lived experience of the policy or in their views on the policy’s impact on the quality of patient care in the province.GoalTo document the experience and views on mandated vaccination of healthcare workers in the province of Ontario, Canada.MethodsBetween February and March 2024, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of Ontario healthcare workers, recruited through professional contacts, social media, and word-of-mouth.FindingsMost respondents, most with 16 or more years of professional experience, were unvaccinated, and most had been terminated due to non-compliance with mandates. As well, and regardless of vaccination status, most respondents reported safety concerns with vaccination, yet did not request an exemption due to their experience of high rejection rates by employers. Nevertheless, most unvaccinated workers reported satisfaction with their vaccination choices, although they also reported significant, negative impacts of the policy on their finances, their mental health, their social and personal relationships, and to a lesser degree, their physical health. In contrast, most respondents within the minority of vaccinated respondents reported being dissatisfied with their vaccination decisions, as well as having experienced mild to serious post vaccine adverse events, with about one-quarter within this group reporting having been coerced into taking further doses, under threat of termination, despite these events. Further, a large minority of respondents reported having witnessed underreporting or dismissal by hospital management of adverse events post vaccination among patients, worse treatment of unvaccinated patients, and concerning changes in practice protocols. Close to half also reported their intention to leave the healthcare industry.DiscussionOur findings indicate that in Ontario, Canada, mandated vaccination in the health sector had an overall negative impact on the well-being of the healthcare labour force, on patient care, on the sustainability of the health system, and on ethical medical practice. Our study should be reproduced in other provinces, as well as in other countries that adopted comparable policies. Findings from this and similar studies should be seriously considered when planning for future health emergencies, to protect health systems in crisis due to severe labour shortages, as well as the right to informed consent of healthcare workers and members of the public.

show abstract