2014
DOI: 10.18352/ulr.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (Political) Pursuit of Victim Voice:<br>(Comparative) Observations on the Dutch Draft on the <i>Adviesrecht<i>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an adversarial system VIS is submitted after conviction and before sentencing. In inquisitorial systems, the assessment of guilt and sentencing occurs during the same court hearing, this means that victims deliver a VIS when the suspect can still be acquitted (Braun, 2013;Kool & Verhage, 2014). Secondly, the role that the judges play in court is different.…”
Section: The Different Roles and Contexts For Victims In European Cri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an adversarial system VIS is submitted after conviction and before sentencing. In inquisitorial systems, the assessment of guilt and sentencing occurs during the same court hearing, this means that victims deliver a VIS when the suspect can still be acquitted (Braun, 2013;Kool & Verhage, 2014). Secondly, the role that the judges play in court is different.…”
Section: The Different Roles and Contexts For Victims In European Cri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the international debates, there has been much contestation about VIS in Dutch policy and politics. When introduced in a limited form in 2005, it was believed that the VIS would better inform the judges about the circumstances and consequences of the alleged offending (Kool & Verhage, 2014). Additionally, it was believed that the defendant might realize the consequences of the crime and then not recidivate.…”
Section: Debates About Vismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding victim services within the criminal justice system may be further complicated where friction exists between victims’ interests and the procedural rights of the accused (e.g. Kool and Verhage, 2014). Tensions have been noted in the USA between NGO-based victim workers and criminal justice personnel (Globokar et al, 2016) in instances of victim-blaming cultures among police (Payne et al, 2008; Payne and Thompson, 2008; Sudderth, 2006) and court personnel (Hartman and Belknap, 2003; Johnson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%