The Cambridge Companion to Cicero 2013
DOI: 10.1017/cco9781139048750.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The political impact of Cicero's speeches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Invectives such as audacia and furor therefore played a crucial role in estranging Catiline from the Senate and the People, and thus in creating support for Cicero's attempts to get rid of him. 12 What is remarkable about Cicero's opening is the equation of audacia with furor. Furor stands for the type of madness that results in rage and is usually inspired by a powerful emotion.…”
Section: Insolent Daring In Cicero's Catilinarian Speechesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invectives such as audacia and furor therefore played a crucial role in estranging Catiline from the Senate and the People, and thus in creating support for Cicero's attempts to get rid of him. 12 What is remarkable about Cicero's opening is the equation of audacia with furor. Furor stands for the type of madness that results in rage and is usually inspired by a powerful emotion.…”
Section: Insolent Daring In Cicero's Catilinarian Speechesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on speeches or speech act analysis have been long regarded as one of the most exciting topics on language, literature/novel and linguistics, especially as an interdisciplinary body of knowledge (Batmang, 2018) (Flanagan, 2013;Mills, 2014). Some experts analysed the pragmatic, social, political, discourse, and critical impact of speeches and its rhetoric (Boromisza-Habashi, 2012;Buysse, 2012;Ellwanger, 2012;Vasaly, 2013), whereas some others preferred to explore the literature, semantic, gestures and its traditional meaning of speech (Bergmann et al, 2011;Nur, 2016;Tur & De Mori, 2011) or the combination of both (Egorova et al, 2013;Fetzer & Bull, 2012;Foucart et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%