2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The political economy of immigration in a direct democracy: The case of Switzerland

Abstract: In this paper, we analyze the determination of immigration policy in a direct democracy setting. We formulate a model of voting and participation behavior integrating instrumental and expressive motivations. The model is estimated using data drawn from a survey carried out after a vote in Switzer- JEL codes: F22, D72, J61.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The only exceptions are two very recent works, Facchini and Mayda (2008a) and Krishnakumar and Mueller (2008). not allowed to work, except for those admitted under specific categories.…”
Section: Migration Policy In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The only exceptions are two very recent works, Facchini and Mayda (2008a) and Krishnakumar and Mueller (2008). not allowed to work, except for those admitted under specific categories.…”
Section: Migration Policy In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studies on attitudes towards immigration seeCard et al (2012);Preston (2004, 2007);Facchini and Mayda (2009);Hainmueller andHiscox (2007, 2010);Krishnakumar and Müller (2012); O'Rourke and Sinnott (2006);Scheve and Slaughter (2001). For studies related to preferences for political parties and/or policies, seeCitrin et al (1997);Dahlberg et al (2012);Dülmer and Klein (2005);Knigge (1998);Lubbers and Scheepers (2000).2 Several studies in the political science literature provide suggestive evidence; see, e.g.,Arzheimer and Carter (2006);Arzheimer (2009);Golder (2003);Jackman and Volper (1996);Knigge (1998) andLubbers, Gijsberts and Scheepers (2002).3 Other studies, for example,Gerdes and Wadensjö (2008), rely on arguably random assignment of refugees in Denmark.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these empirical findings do not address the endogeneity of immigration and are therefore not able to establish a causal link between immigration and political outcomes. The only exception we are aware of is a study by Gerdes and Wadensjö (2008), examining potential causal e↵ects of asylum seekers from outside Europe and the OECD on voting in Denmark. 6 For studies on attitudes towards immigration see Card, Dustmann, and Preston (2012); Preston (2004, 2007); Facchini and Mayda (2009);Hainmueller andHiscox (2007, 2010); Krishnakumar and Müller (2012); O'Rourke and Sinnott (2006); Scheve and Slaughter (2001). For studies related to preferences for political parties, see Citrin, Green, Muste, and Wong (1997); Dülmer and Klein (2005); Knigge (1998);Lubbers and Scheepers (2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%