The Political and Economic Intervention of Non-Fiction Money Literacy Film in the Post-2008 Era

Abstract

L’auteur livre la première analyse critique des illustrations contemporaines de la notion d’argent dans le cinéma documentaire et en indique l’argumentaire prédominant. L’analyse porte sur des films de littératie financière comme The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World (Adrian Pennick, 2009), Money and Life (Katie Teague, 2013), Money Puzzles (Michael Chanan, 2016) et Blockchain City (Ian Kahn, 2018). Elle révèle la réflexion politique et économique qui nourrit la perspective dans laquelle la question monétaire est envisagée dans le film, la façon dont y est racontée l’histoire de l’argent et décrit son rôle dans la société après 2008, et ses conclusions plaident pour une amélioration de la performance du système monétaire. Les constructions narratives, les méthodes d’enquête, la distribution des rôles, les métaphores visuelles et auditives, et les auditoires implicites de ces films sont examinés. L’auteur emploie dans son analyse trois variables complexes qui concourent à dépeindre l’angle économique et politique de chaque œuvre : niveau de formalisme, construction de l’expertise et interprétation de la crise financière.

The Cultivation of Political Identity Literacy in Ideological and Political Classroom Based on IOT and Knowledge Map

“…In the design process of professional curriculum system knowledge map, it is important to realize the comprehensive mastery of professional knowledge by integrating professional knowledge, which is an important premise of designing knowledge map. Knowledge mapping is the integration of professional knowledge information [12]. Through learning, the scattered knowledge points of different courses are classified together to form an overall system, so as to facilitate the memory and application of knowledge.…”

Research on the path of integrating blockchain technology into the teaching of film and television courses in higher education institutions

“…"Wei [32] believes that in addition to professional courses, the elective course of film and television appreciation is the best vehicle for general education in colleges and universities, which not only makes up for the lack of students' comprehensive ability to enter the society, but also coincides with the training goal of general education. Parvulescu [34] concludes through empirical analysis that the art forms in today's society occupy an irreplaceable and important position and have an increasing influence on people, especially young people. The experience of Professor Lacity [35] shows that the quality of film and television works is not only directly related to their social benefits, but also to the international image of the country and the cultural influence of the nation.…”