The Policy Impact of Social Movements: A Replication Through Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Abstract

This article reanalyzes the data of a previous study on the policy impact of antinuclear, ecology, and peace movements in three countries with the aim of replicating its findings. Our goal is to see whether using a different analytical technique will yield similar results. The previous study used a regression approach to time-series analysis. Here, we use qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to analyze the previous study's data. Specifically, we test the two main hypotheses based on the joint-effect model of social movement outcomes: (1) that the policy impact of social movements is conditioned by the presence of powerful allies within the institutional arenas, by the presence of a favorable public opinion, and/or by both factors simultaneously; and (2) that social movements are more likely to have policy impacts when they address issues and policy domains of low saliency. In addition, we compare the policy impact of social movements across countries. Our analysis confirms to a large extent the findings of the earlier time-series analysis, namely, the strong explanatory power of the jointeffect model of social movement outcomes and the varying impact of different movements on public policy.

The Politics of Student Protest and Education Reform in Chile: Challenging the Neoliberal State

“…So why was there a policy window in 2014 that did not exist in 2006? The mechanisms of the student movement's impact on government policy include some of the competing explanations offered in the literature: the threat of disruption in the context of electoral uncertainty, the creation of opportunities for sympathetic political insiders, and favorable public opinion (Giungni and Yamasaki ; Meyer , 16; Piven and Cloward ). The movement's creation, over time, of a challenging frame focused on inequality that reclaimed democracy from the official market‐oriented discourse and the politics of elite consensus allowed all three mechanisms to interact and moved the education policy monopoly to adopt reforms that had been politically impossible prior to the cycle of student protests (Bellei and Cabalin ,118; Donoso ).…”

Toward the Healthy City: People, Places, and The Politics of Urban Planning – By Jason Corburn

“…In his defence, he has gone out of his way to run his analyses with a huge number of variations in terms of the definition of dependent and independent variables, providing some reassurance that the results reported are fairly robust. Even more reassuring is a recent paper he presented (Giugni and Yamasaki, 2007) in which he replicates his main findings with the use of another method, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).…”

What Drives Progressive Policy? Institutional Politics, Political Mediation, Policy Feedbacks, and Early U.S. Old‐Age Policy

“…Each condition must jointly occur to effect progressive change. For instance, in Italy in the 1980s, ecology and antinuclear movements were influential when these three conditions were jointly present (Giugni and Yamasaki 2009). During the U.S. civil rights movement, moreover, extensive protest in the context of a Democratic regime and favorable public opinion preceded the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of the 1960s (McAdam 1999).…”