2020
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv13xpsb4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Poetry of John Tyndall

Abstract: Chalk drawing of John Tyndall c.1850, at the time he was writing many of these poems. Courtesy of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. CoNtENts vii Contents Notes on contributors x Acknowledgements xi Editorial principles and abbreviations xii Poetry in context John Tyndall: The poems 1 Acrostic (Maria) 2 In praise of Bruen 3 The Leighlin "Orators"-or, 'The late repeal meeting' 4 Carlow 5 The testimonial 6 The battle of the constitution is to be fought at the registry 7 Landlord and tenant 8 Lines sent with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No articles were excluded upon screening process. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [ 26 ] was used for published literature and the AACODS [ 27 ] checklist for grey literature (see supplementary materials C , D , E , and F ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No articles were excluded upon screening process. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [ 26 ] was used for published literature and the AACODS [ 27 ] checklist for grey literature (see supplementary materials C , D , E , and F ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) by Pluye and colleagues [ 47 ] will be used to assess mixed-methods studies. The grey literature will be assessed using the authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, date, and significance (AACODS) tool [ 48 ]. Eligible studies will be appraised as either high, medium, or low quality, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach [ 49 ] will be used to assess the overall quality of eligible studies included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected a heterogeneous group of studies using different questions and outcomes, therefore the AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklist (Tyndall, 2010) was applied to assess the veracity of the source, clarity of the methods, acknowledgement of bias, and the relevance of the contribution to the field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%