The Pipeline From Abstract Presentation to Publication in Pediatric Hospital Medicine

Herrmann, Lisa E.; Hall, Matthew; Kyler, Kathryn E.; Cochran, Joseph; Andrews, Annie Lintzenich; Williams, Derek J.; Wilson, Karen M.; Shah, Samir S.

doi:10.12788/jhm.2853

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(67 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of these kinds of assessments were done in various disciplines of surgical meetings, especially orthopedics [2,9,10]. There were only few pediatrics reports available that employed bibliometric analysis [11,12]. Research is a vital component for any specialty of modern medicine in order to explore new frontiers in diseases and their management.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Basu and Pollack [7] showed that 41% of PCCM abstracts presented at national pediatric and critical care conferences were published as a full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals with a mean time to publication of 22 ± 3 months. One such neonatal report demonstrated that only 13.7% of abstracts from a neonatal conference were converted into a publication in the next four years [11,16]. Herrmann et al [11] reported a 33.6% publication conversion rate of abstracts presented at academic meetings in the field of pediatric hospital medicine.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One such neonatal report demonstrated that only 13.7% of abstracts from a neonatal conference were converted into a publication in the next four years [11,16]. Herrmann et al [11] reported a 33.6% publication conversion rate of abstracts presented at academic meetings in the field of pediatric hospital medicine. In a bibliometric report of annual pediatric hematology-oncology meetings, a total of 62% abstracts were published in peer-reviewed journals within a median time to publication of 19 months [17].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Abstract to publication conversion in pediatric critical care medicine in Pakistan

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To determine the rate of conversion of abstracts presented at conferences into full-text articles published in peer-reviewed journals in the field of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) in a developing country. Methods We retrospectively reviewed PCCM abstracts from Pakistan presented at national and international pediatric and critical care conferences over 10 years (January 2010 to March 2020). Data included abstract characteristics, such as presentation (poster/oral), presenter (fellow/resident), time of meeting (month and year), type of meeting, study design and topic; and publication characteristics, such as journal name, time (month and year) and first author. The primary outcome was publication rate of PCCM abstracts presented in meetings and time (months) from presentation to publication. Results A total of 79 PCCM abstracts were presented in 20 meetings during the study period. There were 65 poster presentations (82.28%), of which 63 (79.74%) were presented at international critical care conferences and all presenters were PCCM fellows. In total, 64 (81%) abstracts were descriptive observational studies (retrospective: 50, 63.29%) and prospective (14, 17.72%). Only one was an interventional randomized controlled trial. The publication rate of PCCM abstracts was 63.3% (50/79) and the mean time to publication was 12.39±13.61 months. The publication rate was significantly correlated to the year of publication (P<0.001). Conclusions The PCCM abstract publication rate and mean time from presentation to publication was 63.3% and 12.39±13.61 months, respectively, in a developing country.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Abstract to publication conversion in pediatric critical care medicine in Pakistan

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 Abstract presentation at professional conferences is often the first dissemination step, but journal publication maximizes impact to effect change. 3 Recently, Herrmann et al 4 studied abstract presentation to publication rates of all research submitted to the 2014 national PHM conference. They identified a publication rate of 36% within 30 months after the conference; however, only 37 of the 226 submitted abstracts were educational research.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They identified a publication rate of 36% within 30 months after the conference; however, only 37 of the 226 submitted abstracts were educational research. 4 Barriers to dissemination of educational research through journal publication include a limited number of journals that are focused on educational research, 5 lack of mentorship and protected time, 6 and inadequate instruction on robust educational research methodologies. 2,7 Thus, pathways to publication of educational scholarship should be measured in isolation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathways to Publication in Pediatric Hospital Medicine Educational Research

Solano

Richardson

Walker

et al. 2020

Hospital Pediatrics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES: Dissemination of rigorous, innovative educational research is key to inform best practices among the global medical education community. Although abstract presentation at professional conferences is often the first step, journal publication maximizes impact. The current state of pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) educational scholarship dissemination via journal publication has not been well described. To describe educational research dissemination after PHM conference abstract submission, we identified the publication rate, median time to publication, and median publishing journal impact factor of abstracts submitted over 4 years. METHODS: Abstract data were obtained from the 2014–2017 PHM conferences and organized by presentation type (oral, poster, rejected). PubMed, MedEdPORTAL, and Google Scholar were queried for abstract publication evidence. We used logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Kruskal-Wallis tests to determine the association of presentation type with the odds of publication, time to publication, and publishing journal impact factors. RESULTS: Of 173 submitted educational research abstracts, 56 (32%) were published. Oral abstracts had threefold greater and fivefold greater odds of publication compared to poster and rejected abstracts, respectively (odds ratio 3.2; 95% confidence interval 1.3–8.0; P = .011; odds ratio 5.2; 95% confidence interval 1.6–16.7; P = .003). Median time to publication did not differ between presentation types. The median journal impact factor was >2 times higher for published oral and poster abstracts than published rejected abstracts. CONCLUSIONS: Because abstract acceptance and presentation type may be early indicators of publication success, abstract submission to the PHM conference is a reasonable first step in disseminating educational scholarship.

show abstract

Außer Spesen nichts gewesen?

Oetzmann von Sochaczewski,

Katzer,

Ganschow

et al. 2023

Monatsschr Kinderheilkd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Verschiedentlich wurde die abnehmende Veröffentlichungsquote eingereichter Kongressbeiträge in der deutschen Kindermedizin bemängelt. Fragestellung Die Autoren evaluierten, ob die Veröffentlichungsquote der Kongressbeiträge der Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ) und der Herbsttagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderchirurgie (DGKCH) in den letzten Jahren abgenommen hat, und welche Faktoren mit einer erfolgreichen Veröffentlichung assoziiert sind. Material und Methoden Dazu prüften die Autoren alle in den Jahren 2018–2020 angenommenen Kongressbeiträge auf eine anschließende Veröffentlichung. Damit zusammenhängende Faktoren wurden mittels logistischer Regression anhand präspezifizierter unabhängiger Variablen geprüft. Ergebnisse Die Veröffentlichungsquote der Jahrestagung der DGKJ betrug 40 % (116/290) und der Herbsttagung der DGKCH 42 % (29/69). Verglichen mit der Referenzkategorie der Fallvorstellung war eine Veröffentlichung bei klinischen Studien (adjustiertes Chancenverhältnis 9,3; 95 %-Konfidenzintervall: 5,1–17; p < 0,001) oder bei experimentellen Studien (adjustiertes Chancenverhältnis 23; 95 %-Konfidenzintervall: 4,4–122; p < 0,001) häufiger. Keine Rolle spielte die Art der Präsentation (freier Vortrag gegenüber Posterpräsentation). Der mediane Abstand zwischen Kongressvortrag und Veröffentlichung, unter Ausschluss von 35 vorher veröffentlichten Arbeiten, betrug 434 Tage (Interquartilsabstand: 219–708). Die 145 veröffentlichten Arbeiten erschienen in 96 verschiedenen Zeitschriften, davon war ein Fünftel auf Deutsch verfasst. Diskussion Die Veröffentlichungsquote der untersuchten Kongresse liegt mit 40 % höher als erwartet. Die relativ hohe Quote an deutschsprachigen Arbeiten weist auf einen Bedarf an nationalen Zeitschriften hin.

show abstract

The Pipeline From Abstract Presentation to Publication in Pediatric Hospital Medicine

Abstract: reviewers may be able to identify methodologically sound studies for presentation; however, the low overall publication rate may indicate that presented results are preliminary or signify a need for increased mentorship and resources for research development in PHM.

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

Abstract to publication conversion in pediatric critical care medicine in Pakistan

Abstract to publication conversion in pediatric critical care medicine in Pakistan

Pathways to Publication in Pediatric Hospital Medicine Educational Research

Außer Spesen nichts gewesen?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About