“…Although the absolute stereochemistry of compounds 1 and 2 , which can be crucial for the biological activity, was not determined, it is assumed that they are 2 S ,3 R ,14 S ,20 R ,22 R ,25-hexahydroxy-5 S -cholest-7-en-6-one (2β,3β,14α,20 R ,22 R ,25-hexahydroxy-5β-cholest-7-en-6-one) and 2 S ,3 R ,5 S, 14 S ,20 R ,22 R ,25-heptahydroxy-5 S -cholest-7-en-6-one (2β,3β,5β,14α,20 R ,22 R ,25-heptahydroxy-5β-cholest-7-en-6-one), respectively, as established by X-ray crystallographic studies [ 28 ], which confirmed an earlier established structure of an ecdysone skeleton [ 29 ]. Additionally, one general route of ecdysone biosynthesis in plants has been established without variability in the stereochemistry, except for the trans or cis junction of A/B rings [ 10 , 30 ]. Moreover, any epimeric form would be recognized by an apparent change in the multiplicity and magnitude of coupling constants of a methine 1 H NMR signal at a chiral center, and a chemical 13 C NMR shift of the vicinal carbon signal, as exemplified by 22 R and 22 S epimers of 20-hydroxyecdysone [ 31 ].…”