1945
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ph.07.030145.000343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Physical Properties of Protoplasm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1947
1947
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He wrote that, "It is my belief that many of the reactions characteristic of living processes have to do more with the water relationships of the organism than any other single factor" (33). For example, William Seifriz, a prominent student of protoplasm at the time, wrote a review with the title The Properties of Protoplasm (77), in which Gortner's papers were not mentioned, and the concept of bound water not considered at all. But his words apparently had little impact.…”
Section: Water: the Overlooked Component Of Protoplasmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He wrote that, "It is my belief that many of the reactions characteristic of living processes have to do more with the water relationships of the organism than any other single factor" (33). For example, William Seifriz, a prominent student of protoplasm at the time, wrote a review with the title The Properties of Protoplasm (77), in which Gortner's papers were not mentioned, and the concept of bound water not considered at all. But his words apparently had little impact.…”
Section: Water: the Overlooked Component Of Protoplasmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognized that the theory of flow caused by differential pressure in the plasmasol, which is so well accepted for Amoeba proteus and related genera and for Mycetozoa (reviews, Seifriz, 1942;De Bruyn, 1947;Bovee, 1952;Noland, 1957; also Kamaiya and Kurodo, 1958), would not explain the streaming of Foraminifera. This was pointed out clearly by Sandon (1934) who recognized the significance of the fact that there is no tube of plasmagel and no evidence of solgel reversibility in the active pseudopodia, and stated that it was time for another explanation to be developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%