Analysis and Simulation of Semiconductor Devices 1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8752-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Physical Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N a , N d and N B are the doping concentration in the channel, S/D region and the body terminal in a four-terminal TFT respectively. The impact ionization model for the kink effect is the Selberherr model [11], which can be simplified to the classical Chynoweth model [12], as given below for the impact ionization rate for electrons α n and holes α p , respectively:…”
Section: Results and Discussion A IV Fitting Of Conventional Tftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N a , N d and N B are the doping concentration in the channel, S/D region and the body terminal in a four-terminal TFT respectively. The impact ionization model for the kink effect is the Selberherr model [11], which can be simplified to the classical Chynoweth model [12], as given below for the impact ionization rate for electrons α n and holes α p , respectively:…”
Section: Results and Discussion A IV Fitting Of Conventional Tftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we consider the charge Q it due to the interface states. In indirect-bandgap semiconductors such as Si with a low carrier density below 10 17 cm −3 , the charge (electron and hole) transfer between the interface and bulk states at low carrier density can be explained by the model with Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) statistics [ 25 26 ]. This model is based on the charge capture and emission between the interface and bulk states ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that and are the capture rates for electrons and holes per electron and hole, respectively, when all interface states are unoccupied, and and are the emission rates for electrons and holes per electron and hole, respectively. The capture rates per unit volume for electrons and holes ( and ) are given by [ 25 26 ]…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, analytical equations can be extremely useful in the design and simulation of semiconductor devices because they can be very easily incorporated in the numerical model and take us away from the inherent complexity of the Monte Carlo technique. A great deal of work has been invested on the derivation of phenomenological expressions that model the various experimentally observed mobility phenomena (Selberherr, 1984). Empirical expressions, derived from experimental curves or Monte Carlo calculations, are simpler than analytical solutions yet very accurate and valid for a wide range of electric field values (Costa et al , 1989; Cordero et al , 1993).…”
Section: Device Structure and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%