1934
DOI: 10.1037/13520-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physical and mental growth of prematurely born children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1937
1937
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In few studies of the growth of prematurely born children has attention been paid to social background. Hess, Mohr and Bartelme (1934), using a control group of siblings, found that prematurely born boys had caught up in weight and height by 3 years, and girls somewhat earlier, except for those who were less than 3k lb. at birth.…”
Section: Correlation and Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In few studies of the growth of prematurely born children has attention been paid to social background. Hess, Mohr and Bartelme (1934), using a control group of siblings, found that prematurely born boys had caught up in weight and height by 3 years, and girls somewhat earlier, except for those who were less than 3k lb. at birth.…”
Section: Correlation and Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding figure for Terman's group of 905 unselected children is but 11.55 per cent. On this point our material bears out the contentions of such writers as Comberg (36), Mohr and Bertelme (37), and some few others (38). § 8.…”
Section: Table VI Distribution Of the Complications In The Twin-pairs...mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Capper (1928), in describing his series of full-term, immature children, states: 'Of those that remain alive, the majority are physically as well as mentally underdeveloped'. On the other hand, Hess et al (1934) believe that premature babies, provided they do not suffer brain damage at birth, develop normally. These views emphasize the necessity of recognizing that the prognosis for the full-term, immature ('small for dates') baby is not the same as that for the infant born prematurely (Naeye 1965, Jarvinen et al 1957.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%