2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The photoheating of the intergalactic medium in synthesis models of the UV background

Abstract: We compare cosmological hydrodynamical simulations combined with the homogeneous metagalactic UV background (UVB) of Haardt & Madau (2012) (HM2012) to observations of the Lyman-α forest that are sensitive to the thermal and ionization state of the intergalactic medium (IGM). The transition from optically thick to thin photoheating predicted by the simple one-zone, radiative transfer model implemented by HM2012 predicts a thermal history that is in remarkably good agreement with the observed rise of the IGM tem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
174
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
26
174
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution to this equation yields the correct slope of γ − 1 = 1/(1 + β). The Puchwein et al (2014) approach does hold insight into what sets the asymptotic slope, and indeed is our solution specializing to the case in which the density of a gas parcel is constant in time (our solutions for n = 3). However, this explanation ignores the adiabatic cooling associated with the dilation of space, the primary reason why memory of the initial conditions is lost within a doubling time of the scale factor.…”
Section: Previous Explanations For γmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solution to this equation yields the correct slope of γ − 1 = 1/(1 + β). The Puchwein et al (2014) approach does hold insight into what sets the asymptotic slope, and indeed is our solution specializing to the case in which the density of a gas parcel is constant in time (our solutions for n = 3). However, this explanation ignores the adiabatic cooling associated with the dilation of space, the primary reason why memory of the initial conditions is lost within a doubling time of the scale factor.…”
Section: Previous Explanations For γmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Subsequently, ⋆ mcquinn@uw.edu 1 Most studies that use numerical simulations implicitly adopt such a parametrization, as standard cosmological simulations employ uniform radiation backgrounds -an approximation which guarantees a near power-law relation. Theuns et al (1998) and Puchwein et al (2014) attempted to provide more intuitive derivations that we show are problematic. In addition, previous studies did not address how non-adiabatic cooling processes affect this relation, namely Compton cooling off of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and recombination cooling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small modification to the He II photoheating rate, HeII = 1.7 HM12 HeII for 2.2 < z < 3.4, is applied to match observational measurements of the IGM temperature at mean density, T 0 , inferred from the curvature of Ly α forest absorption lines (Becker et al 2011). A boost to the IGM temperature from non-equilibrium and radiative transfer effects during He II reionization is expected at these redshifts (Abel & Haehnelt 1999;McQuinn et al 2009;Puchwein et al 2015).…”
Section: Hydrodynamical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoionization and photoheating rates are given by those in HM12. This allows for a comparison with other studies that employ a uniform UV background (Becker et al 2011a;Puchwein et al 2015). However, for a fair comparison with the other simulations presented here, we have renormalized these rates to match τ eff as outlined in Section 2.3.…”
Section: Details Of the Simulation Suitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interplay of these two factors determines the temperature of these regions of average density. The average temperature of these regions show two characteristic bumps as a function of redshift: one initial increase from T ∼ 200 K to T ∼ 10 4 K as a result of hydrogen reionization at 8 z 10, and a subsequent increase in temperature from T ∼ 10 4 K to T ∼ 2 × 10 4 K at 2 z 3.5 as a result of helium reionization (Furlanetto & Oh 2008;Puchwein et al 2015;Upton Sanderbeck et al 2016). In between the two epochs of reionization, and following helium ii reionization, adiabatic cooling dominates, and so the average temperature decreases.…”
Section: Temperature At Mean Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%