The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the intergalactic temperature–density relation

Abstract: Cosmological simulations of the low-density intergalactic medium exhibit a strikingly tight power-law relation between temperature and density that holds over two decades in density. It is found that this relation should roughly apply ∆z ∼ 1 − 2 after a reionization event, and this limiting behavior has motivated the power-law parameterizations used in most analyses of the Lyα forest. This relation has been explained by using equations linearized in the baryonic overdensity (which does not address why a tight … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At z = 5 the temperature field in the inhomogeneous approach (third row left column panel) shows lingering signatures of the temperature fluctuations on ∼ 5 h −1 Mpc scales. In this run different regions of the Universe are reionized and heated at different times, and so they asymptote to the temperature set by the balance between photoheating and the adiabatic and Compton cooling governing the temperature-density relationship at different times (McQuinn & Upton Sanderbeck 2016). In this particular case we see that the high-density regions, which reionized at high redshift have had time to cool and show lower temperatures than the low-density regions, which were reionized much later (D'Aloisio et al 2015;Davies et al 2018a).…”
Section: Comparison Of Flash and Inhomogeneous Reionization Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…At z = 5 the temperature field in the inhomogeneous approach (third row left column panel) shows lingering signatures of the temperature fluctuations on ∼ 5 h −1 Mpc scales. In this run different regions of the Universe are reionized and heated at different times, and so they asymptote to the temperature set by the balance between photoheating and the adiabatic and Compton cooling governing the temperature-density relationship at different times (McQuinn & Upton Sanderbeck 2016). In this particular case we see that the high-density regions, which reionized at high redshift have had time to cool and show lower temperatures than the low-density regions, which were reionized much later (D'Aloisio et al 2015;Davies et al 2018a).…”
Section: Comparison Of Flash and Inhomogeneous Reionization Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It also shows the thermal history of the LateR (blue), MiddleR (magenta) and EarlyR (orange) simulations. In the upper left panel we plot the evolution of γ, which exhibits the expected convergence to a value close to ∼ 1.6 after all reionization events for all models, resulting from the balance of photoheating with adiabatic cooling (Hui & Gnedin 1997;McQuinn & Upton Sanderbeck 2016). The larger decrease of γ during He ii reionization in the EarlyR, MiddleR, and LateR runs seems to indicate a temperature increase more independent of density than in the HM12 run.…”
Section: The Ionization and Thermal History Of The Igmmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…where ∆ b is the baryon overdensity and T 0 is the temperature of the IGM at mean density. We include thermal fluctuations of the IGM using the standard power-law scaling relation (Hui & Gnedin 1997;McQuinn & Upton Sanderbeck 2016),…”
Section: From the Cross-correlation Of Galaxies With Transmitted Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%