2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11671-010-9603-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Photodynamic Effect of Different Size ZnO Nanoparticles on Cancer Cell Proliferation In Vitro

Abstract: Nanomaterials have widely been used in the field of biological and biomedicine, such as tissue imaging, diagnosis and cancer therapy. In this study, we explored the cytotoxicity and photodynamic effect of different-sized ZnO nanoparticles to target cells. Our observations demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles exerted dose-dependent and time-dependent cytotoxicity for cancer cells like hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells in vitro. Meanwhile, it was observed that UV irradiation could enhance the suppression a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference on cPARP expression between cells irradiated with lower laser intensity or exposed to lower particle concentration suggests that the synergistic effect between laser and HNPs is dominated by direct DNA photo-damages, but also implies other subsidiary mechanisms, such as a thermal effects and cell membranes disruption. [28][29][30] The apoptotic cell fraction in samples exposed to 540 nm laser but not treated with HNPs can be ascribed to direct two-photon absorption by DNA, as previously observed. 31,32 Such a non HNP-specific interaction can be easily counteracted thanks to the fact that the cellular effects exerted by BFO HNPs are limited to the area of the laser spot, as highlighted in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The difference on cPARP expression between cells irradiated with lower laser intensity or exposed to lower particle concentration suggests that the synergistic effect between laser and HNPs is dominated by direct DNA photo-damages, but also implies other subsidiary mechanisms, such as a thermal effects and cell membranes disruption. [28][29][30] The apoptotic cell fraction in samples exposed to 540 nm laser but not treated with HNPs can be ascribed to direct two-photon absorption by DNA, as previously observed. 31,32 Such a non HNP-specific interaction can be easily counteracted thanks to the fact that the cellular effects exerted by BFO HNPs are limited to the area of the laser spot, as highlighted in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…It has been suggested that due to a wide band gap (energy donor capacity), ZnO NPs could act as novel photosensitizers, or at least as potentiators of the conventional photosensitizing drugs, in photodynamic therapy of cancer. 43 Recent studies reported that UV irradiation could readily enhance the proliferation-suppression ability of ZnO NPs on cancer cells. 43,44 Our XRD results confirm the crystalline nature of ZnO NPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Recent studies reported that UV irradiation could readily enhance the proliferation-suppression ability of ZnO NPs on cancer cells. 43,44 Our XRD results confirm the crystalline nature of ZnO NPs. SEM and TEM showed that NPs were polygonal in shape with a smooth surface, were fairly distributed, and had an average diameter of 21 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have reported that TiO 2 , Ag and ZnO nanoparticles kill cells if they are in direct contact to the nanoparticle which happens, for example when the nanoparticles are added to a medium containing cells 269,270,[354][355][356] . In contrast, the likelihood of nanoparticles killing cells is reduced by incorporating nanoparticles into a polymer matric 244,263,357 .…”
Section: Effect Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%