2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0146-6380(03)00061-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phosphorus composition of temperate pasture soils determined by NaOH–EDTA extraction and solution 31 P NMR spectroscopy

Abstract: Information on the composition and dynamics of soil phosphorus (P) remains limited, but is integral to understanding soil biogeochemical cycles. We used solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to characterise NaOH-EDTA extractable P in 29 permanent pasture soils from England and Wales (total carbon 29-80 g kg-1 soil, clay 219-681 g kg-1 soil, pH 4.4-6.8). Total P ranged between 376 and 1981 mg P kg-1 soil, of which between 45 and 88% was extracted with NaOH-EDTA. The extracts were dominated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
169
8
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(84 reference statements)
18
169
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the role of pyrophosphate in the nutrition of plants remains poorly understood, due in part to the difficulty in its quantification at low concentrations in soil solution. Ion chromatography was used to assess the fate of pyrophosphate fertilizer added to soils (e.g., McBeath et al, 2007), while pyrophosphate can be quantified in alkaline soil extracts by solution 31 P NMR spectroscopy (e.g., Turner et al, 2003). However, the latter procedure is inappropriate for analysis of soil solution due to its relative insensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role of pyrophosphate in the nutrition of plants remains poorly understood, due in part to the difficulty in its quantification at low concentrations in soil solution. Ion chromatography was used to assess the fate of pyrophosphate fertilizer added to soils (e.g., McBeath et al, 2007), while pyrophosphate can be quantified in alkaline soil extracts by solution 31 P NMR spectroscopy (e.g., Turner et al, 2003). However, the latter procedure is inappropriate for analysis of soil solution due to its relative insensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical shifts were recorded relative to 85% H 3 PO 4 standard (δ = 0 ppm). Signals were assigned to P species based on data in the literature (Cade-Menun, 2005;Turner et al, 2003b). Peak assignments were made using 31 P-NMR chemical shifts of phosphonate (phon-P: 12 to 23 ppm), orthophosphate (ortho-P: 6 to 7 ppm), orthophosphate monoesters (mono-P: 4 to 6 ppm), phospholipids (lipids-P: 1 to 3 ppm), deoxyribonucleic acid phosphorus (DNA-P: 0 ppm), and pyrophosphate (pyro-P: −3.5 to −4.5 ppm) (Fig.…”
Section: Sediment Analysis and 31 P-nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak areas were calculated by visual inspection and an automated peak analysis tool. From the areas for the different P species, the contribution of each P compound group was calculated relative to TP in the NaOH-EDTA extract, determined by the molybdenum blue method (Cade-Menun, 2005;Turner et al, 2003b).…”
Section: Sediment Analysis and 31 P-nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical shifts were recorded relative to 85 % H 3 PO 4 standard (δ=0 ppm). Signals were assigned to P compounds based on data reported in the literature (Turner et al 2003b;. Peak assignments were made using 31 P-NMR chemical shifts of phosphonate (phon-P 12 to 23 ppm), orthophosphate (ortho-P 6 to 7 ppm), orthophosphate monoesters (mono-P 4 to 6 ppm), phospholipids (lipids-P 1 to 3 ppm), deoxyribonucleic acid phosphorus (DNA-P 0 ppm), and pyrophosphate (pyro-P −3.5 to −4.5 ppm).…”
Section: Naoh-edta Extraction and Solution 31 P-nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak area responses of samples were calculated by visual inspection and an automated peak analysis tool. Based on the peak area responses for each P species, the contribution of each P compound group was calculated relative to TP in the NaOH-EDTA extraction determined by molybdenum blue method (Shinohara et al 2012;Turner et al 2003b). Lake City Fig.…”
Section: Naoh-edta Extraction and Solution 31 P-nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%