2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phenotype of academic pathology chairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared to academic pathology chairs, 10 only a minority of PDs were MD/PhDs, at 15%, which likely suggests a clinical/education focus rather than a research focus. The majority of PDs and APDs were more junior in years in practice and by academic rank with a total of 57% being in practice <10 years, with 33% being in practice <5 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As compared to academic pathology chairs, 10 only a minority of PDs were MD/PhDs, at 15%, which likely suggests a clinical/education focus rather than a research focus. The majority of PDs and APDs were more junior in years in practice and by academic rank with a total of 57% being in practice <10 years, with 33% being in practice <5 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, information from a recent survey of chairs demonstrates that 44% of female and 22% of male academic pathology chairs had served as a residency PD, suggesting that service as a PD may be part of a trajectory toward ascending levels of leadership. 10 The majority had not served as a fellowship director, which is likely a function of being selected <5 years into their careers, and the prohibition of allowing one individual to serve concurrently as both residency and fellowship PD at many institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations