2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phenotype of pathology residency program directors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, at the time the survey was performed, there were no program directors who identified as a gender other than cisgender (specifically male or female). 25 When the gender lens is turned to department chairs, everyone is underrepresented when compared with men. 24 When one looks at ethnicity in academic pathology leadership, there are far fewer gains.…”
Section: Lessons Learned and A Path Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, at the time the survey was performed, there were no program directors who identified as a gender other than cisgender (specifically male or female). 25 When the gender lens is turned to department chairs, everyone is underrepresented when compared with men. 24 When one looks at ethnicity in academic pathology leadership, there are far fewer gains.…”
Section: Lessons Learned and A Path Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per the abovementioned study, 76% of program directors identified as White, 16% identified as Asian or South Asian, 7% identified as Hispanic or Latinx, and 3% identified as Black or African American. 25 No program directors were identified as Native Hawaiian, Native American, Native Alaskan, or Pacific Islander. 25 At the academic department chair level, women continue to be underrepresented.…”
Section: Lessons Learned and A Path Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation