Under Suspicion 2012
DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231146180.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Phenomenology of Medial Sincerity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially since, by using the archive as a working tool, the artist capitalizes on places with a cultural background, which may have been omitted in the context of history. Nevertheless, the archive is not only a mechanism for triggering history, but for memory it becomes, as Boris Groys claims: "a machine for the production of memories, a machine that fabricates history out of the material of non-collected reality" (Groys, 2012).…”
Section: The Concrete Transposition Of Memory: the Archive As An Arti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially since, by using the archive as a working tool, the artist capitalizes on places with a cultural background, which may have been omitted in the context of history. Nevertheless, the archive is not only a mechanism for triggering history, but for memory it becomes, as Boris Groys claims: "a machine for the production of memories, a machine that fabricates history out of the material of non-collected reality" (Groys, 2012).…”
Section: The Concrete Transposition Of Memory: the Archive As An Arti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in existential phenomenology, in being seen by others, the lived-body no longer exists in and of itself but, rather, as the body-for-others (Groys, 2012 ; Morris, 2003 ; Sartre, 1969 ). Morris ( 2003 ) has suggested that Sartre’s reference to invisibility is relevant to the experience of BDD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Загалом, певна утопічність самої ідеї синтетичної музики полягала у спробі винести за дужки власне інструментарій, зробивши його абсолютно прозорим, позбавленим будь-яких неможливостей. Але те, що є абсолютно «інструментальним», позбавляє довіри сам принцип інструментальності і спонукає до пошуку нових «прихованих явищ», які втручаються у процес комунікації і викривлюють його на свою користь (тут варто пригадати медіа-теорію Бориса Ґройса [2]). Абсолютизація будь-якого принципу призводить до підозри, що цей принцип є лише поверхневим наслідком дії більш фундаментального, прихованого від нас закону.…”
unclassified