1996
DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04758.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Clemastine and Phenylpropanolamine in Single‐Component and Combination Formulations

Abstract: Studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers (n = 171; age range, 19-49 years; 22-27 subjects per study) to examine the following: pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of the antihistamine clemastine; the effect of coadministration of phenylpropanolamine and clemastine on the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs; and the bioavailability of clemastine tablets and combination tablets of clemastine and sustained-release phenyl-propanolamine under fasted and fed conditions after single-dose administration a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plasma kinetic data of clemastine in dogs reveal that the oral bioavailability was low, between 1 and 6%, similar to the 3.4% reported recently to be the oral bioavailability of clemastine in horses 21 . This is considerably lower than the 20–70% estimated for humans 18 . The data are not really comparable as the human data are estimated from oral administration of the drug only, but it can be concluded that one prominent difference between humans, on the one hand, and dogs and horses, on the other hand, is in the uptake and/or first passage metabolism of oral clemastine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The plasma kinetic data of clemastine in dogs reveal that the oral bioavailability was low, between 1 and 6%, similar to the 3.4% reported recently to be the oral bioavailability of clemastine in horses 21 . This is considerably lower than the 20–70% estimated for humans 18 . The data are not really comparable as the human data are estimated from oral administration of the drug only, but it can be concluded that one prominent difference between humans, on the one hand, and dogs and horses, on the other hand, is in the uptake and/or first passage metabolism of oral clemastine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The data are not really comparable as the human data are estimated from oral administration of the drug only, but it can be concluded that one prominent difference between humans, on the one hand, and dogs and horses, on the other hand, is in the uptake and/or first passage metabolism of oral clemastine. The plasma concentrations obtained in studies of the three species were rather similar although the doses given differed considerably (0.025, 0.2 and 0.5 mg kg −1 , respectively, for humans, horses and dogs, respectively) 18,21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Being an ethanolamine derivative it also possesses anticholinergic activity, resulting in a sedative effect. It is administered orally in small doses (2 × 1 mg up to 3 × 2 mg per day) which in turn leads to very low blood levels (C max is around 0.6 ng/ml/1 mg dose) [1]. The lack of sufficiently sensitive analytical methods therefore hindered the extensive study of its pharmacokinetic properties for a long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent gas chromatographic method with nitrogen-phosphorous detection was validated having a lower quantitation limit of 0.1 ng/ml [4]. Radioimmunoassay has proven to be selective and sensitive enough to measure pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of clemastine in several studies with 0.1 ng/ml minimum measurable concentration [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%