2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2004.00367.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical pharmacology of clemastine in healthy dogs

Abstract: The pharmacokinetic properties of clemastine were investigated in six healthy dogs and compared with the effect of the drug recorded as inhibition of wheal formation induced by intradermal injections of histamine. Clemastine clearance was high (median: 2.1 L h(-1) kg(-1)) and the volume of distribution large (13.4 L kg(-1)). The half-life after intravenous administration was 3.8 h and the plasma protein binding level in vitro was 98%. After oral administration, the bioavailability was only 3%. Given intravenou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the species variation was demonstrated in a recent study that evaluated the clinical pharmacology of clemastine in healthy dogs. 27 In this study, clemastine, an antihistamine perceived to be of highest clinical efficacy in dogs, exhibited a poor bioavailability and failed to inhibit histamine-induced skin reactions after oral administration. 27 To improve the gap in knowledge of the pharmacology of hydroxyzine in dogs, the main objective of this randomized, blinded, crossover study was to demonstrate whether oral administration of hydroxyzine to healthy dogs produces plasma concentrations of this drug and/or its active metabolite cetirizine that are sufficient to suppress histamine and anticanine IgE antibody-mediated wheal and flare reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The importance of the species variation was demonstrated in a recent study that evaluated the clinical pharmacology of clemastine in healthy dogs. 27 In this study, clemastine, an antihistamine perceived to be of highest clinical efficacy in dogs, exhibited a poor bioavailability and failed to inhibit histamine-induced skin reactions after oral administration. 27 To improve the gap in knowledge of the pharmacology of hydroxyzine in dogs, the main objective of this randomized, blinded, crossover study was to demonstrate whether oral administration of hydroxyzine to healthy dogs produces plasma concentrations of this drug and/or its active metabolite cetirizine that are sufficient to suppress histamine and anticanine IgE antibody-mediated wheal and flare reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Rarely did trials employ optimal dose‐finding strategies. Unfortunately, as shown for the antihistamine clemastine, pharmacogenetic differences can lead to a drug being bioavailable in humans but not in dogs 66,67 . Therefore, the lack of evidence of any efficacy for a particular intervention could be due, in part or in all, to inappropriate or suboptimal drug dosages.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a lack of clinical benefit could be due to inappropriate dosages, frequency of administration or type of antihistamine used. For example, clemastine is a type 1 antihistamine that has been used for almost two decades, yet it has been shown recently not to be bioavailable and to lack effect after oral use in dogs (COE IIb) 57 . In the absence of convincing clinical trials, if veterinarians wish to use type 1 antihistamines, they should limit their prescription to those drugs with demonstrable inhibitory effect of intradermal histamine injections in dogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%