1972
DOI: 10.1017/s0079497x00012135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The petrological identification of stone implements from South-Western England: Fifth Report of the Sub-Committee of the South-Western Federation of Museums and Art Galleries

Abstract: The present report is the fifth to be issued by this Committee in the course of 35 years' work on the petrological identification of stone implements. The four earlier reports (Keiller, Piggott and Wallis, 1941; Stone and Wallis, 1947; Stone and Wallis, 1951; Evens, Grinsell, Piggott and Wallis, 1962—hereafter referred to as the Fourth Report) were concerned primarily with stone implements from South-Western England, but also included implements from other parts of the British Isles. Since the early 1960s, whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent publication of implement identifications from Yorkshire (Keen and Radley 1971); East Anglia (Clough and Green 1972); Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland (Cummins and Moore 1973); and the continuing work on the South-West (Evens et al 1972) has resulted in a much clearer picture emerging of the overall distribution of the various petrological groups. This report, dealing with Leicestershire and Derbyshire, has produced no surprises in the form of the discovery of any further groups, and can add very little to the chronology of the implement groups.…”
Section: Archaeological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent publication of implement identifications from Yorkshire (Keen and Radley 1971); East Anglia (Clough and Green 1972); Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland (Cummins and Moore 1973); and the continuing work on the South-West (Evens et al 1972) has resulted in a much clearer picture emerging of the overall distribution of the various petrological groups. This report, dealing with Leicestershire and Derbyshire, has produced no surprises in the form of the discovery of any further groups, and can add very little to the chronology of the implement groups.…”
Section: Archaeological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%