1964
DOI: 10.1080/00369226408735917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Perth re‐advance in Central Scotland, Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17D). It is noteworthy that the ice limits during our Stage D (and stage 3 of Paterson et al, 1998) are consistent with the ice sheet configuration in central Scotland suggested by Sissons (1963Sissons ( , 1964Sissons ( , 1967b during the hypothesised 'Perth Readvance'. All require the presence of a large ice mass over the Firth of Clyde during deglaciation.…”
Section: Towards a Regional Synthesissupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…17D). It is noteworthy that the ice limits during our Stage D (and stage 3 of Paterson et al, 1998) are consistent with the ice sheet configuration in central Scotland suggested by Sissons (1963Sissons ( , 1964Sissons ( , 1967b during the hypothesised 'Perth Readvance'. All require the presence of a large ice mass over the Firth of Clyde during deglaciation.…”
Section: Towards a Regional Synthesissupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The configuration is roughly that originally proposed for the 'Perth Readvance' in central Scotland (Sissons, 1963(Sissons, , 1964(Sissons, , 1967b. Of note is the limited bedform development from this stage, with only a small patch of Group IV bedforms occurring in the east.…”
Section: Late Devensian Glaciation; Stage Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dyke, 1993). The Perth Readvance was proposed by Simpson (1933) and supported by Sissons (1963aSissons ( , 1964Sissons ( , 1967b based upon the distribution of ice-marginal depositional complexes, particularly glacifluvial landform assemblages, and their association with raised shorelines. Although the Perth Readvance was later rejected by Paterson (1974) and even by Sissons (1974aSissons ( ,b, 1976aSissons ( , 1981 himself, account needs to be taken of the glacifluvial landform assemblages originally used in its identification.…”
Section: Northern and Central Scotlandmentioning
confidence: 99%