1979
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90227-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The peripheral critical flicker frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
6

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the following facts, though not speaking directly to the issue, concur in suggesting that under some conditions a foveal excitation takes longer to decay than a parafoveal one. First, there is some data (e.g., Hartmann, Lachenmayr, & Brettel, 1979) that suggests that, under certain conditions of lighting, flicker fusion frequency is higher in parafoveal regions. Incidental evidence to support this can be obtained by looking at a small TV screen.…”
Section: Flash Localization During Saccadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the following facts, though not speaking directly to the issue, concur in suggesting that under some conditions a foveal excitation takes longer to decay than a parafoveal one. First, there is some data (e.g., Hartmann, Lachenmayr, & Brettel, 1979) that suggests that, under certain conditions of lighting, flicker fusion frequency is higher in parafoveal regions. Incidental evidence to support this can be obtained by looking at a small TV screen.…”
Section: Flash Localization During Saccadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when Bahrami (2003) reported that target color changes are detected more often than form changes, this could also be traced back to luminance and contrast sensitivity differences of the retina, such that foveal vision might be advantageous for detecting form changes due to its higher spatial resolution (Gralla, 2007). Besides this, the higher temporal resolution (Hartmann et al, 1979) and the superior motion detection capability of the peripheral visual system (Finlay, 1982;McKee & Nakayama, 1984) also predict high detection rates for motion changes in MOT. In this regard, it is really surprising that, to date, no attempt has been made to implement a motion-change detection task to examine the role of peripheral vision in MOT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neuroanatomically, the capability to process visual information in the far periphery seems to be controlled by distinct, specialized cortical networks (for a recent review, see Yu, Chaplin, & Rosa, 2015). Furthermore, in comparison to foveal vision, peripheral vision features higher temporal resolution (Hartmann, Lachenmayr, & Brettel, 1979) and superior motion detection (Finlay, 1982;McKee & Nakayama, 1984). Thus, whereas foveal vision with its high spatial resolution is important for extracting detailed information, a crucial role for peripheral vision seems to refer to the processing of changing aspects in the visual environment (for a review, see Strasburger, Rentschler, & Jüttner, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Más eredményeket kapunk, ha a LED-fényt a foveára vagy a retina perifériájára fókuszáljuk [1]. A továbbiak-ban a centrális, vagyis a foveára fókuszált CFF tárgyalásá-val foglalkozunk kizárólagosan.…”
unclassified
“…Az eredményt módosító faktor lehet például a megvilágító fény ereje [1], színe [4,5], kitöltési tényező-je [6] (a LED egy periódusra vonatkozó világítás időtar-tama). Továbbá módosul a CFF cataracta [7] vagy maculadegeneráció [4] jelenlétében, alkoholfogyasztás [8] és dohányzás [8] hatására, és nemtől függően [9] is.…”
unclassified