1995
DOI: 10.1109/26.380048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of Reed-Solomon codes on a bursty-noise channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, studying the trade-off between modulation order and FEC overhead. We perform code rate adaptation based on Reed-Solomon code with a block length of 255 bytes, i.e., RS(255,k) [39], [40]. Fig.…”
Section: Pam Performance Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, studying the trade-off between modulation order and FEC overhead. We perform code rate adaptation based on Reed-Solomon code with a block length of 255 bytes, i.e., RS(255,k) [39], [40]. Fig.…”
Section: Pam Performance Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, an interleaver is considered to make the errors independent at the input of the outer RS decoder. Finally, the BER at the output of the exploited outer RS decoder with no decoding failures is obtained by [55,Eq. (16)- (19)] assuming negligible probability of undetected errors.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the impact of physical-layer impairments on the transmission rate for different modulation orders, we deploy a forward error correction (FEC) code with rate adaptation. We use a Reed-Solomon code with block length of 255 bytes [34], i.e., RS(255, k), where k is chosen by the switch controller after calculating the pre-FEC BER such that the post-FEC BER becomes less than 10 −12 . The larger the pre-FEC BER, the smaller the value of k, and the lower the effective bit rate per transmitter.…”
Section: Cross-layer Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%