2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of active noise-canceling headphones in different noise environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the presented results would only serve as relative measurements for benchmarking of the composite earmuffs with the reference earmuff. The same limitation was highlighted in a recent study by Ang et al [22]. In this case, the presented results must not be misunderstood as a direct indication of real-ear attenuation values, which is one of the most accurate evaluation methods for hearing protection devices [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, the presented results would only serve as relative measurements for benchmarking of the composite earmuffs with the reference earmuff. The same limitation was highlighted in a recent study by Ang et al [22]. In this case, the presented results must not be misunderstood as a direct indication of real-ear attenuation values, which is one of the most accurate evaluation methods for hearing protection devices [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As such, the results obtained from the simulator were only valid as relative measurements for benchmarking of the composite earmuffs with the commercial earmuff. Ang et al [36] highlighted the same limitation in a recent study. Therefore, the presented results must not be misunderstood as a direct indication of real-ear attenuation values, which is one of the most accurate evaluation methods for HPDs [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In particular, sound attenuation achieved in the higher frequency range by active control is below that which can be simply achieved through passive control, i.e. earmuffs, with these often delivering over 30 dB reduction 33,34 . However, such comparison is unfair since the aim of an ANC headrest system is to eliminate the use of the passive attenuation materials which deliver such reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%