2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2003.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of a size-structured stock assessment method in the face of spatial heterogeneity in growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common-held belief that the ratio of the current stock size to the stock size in some historical year is estimated more robustly than recent stock size in absolute terms (e.g., Punt 1989;Punt et al 2002) was therefore not supported for rock lobster off Victoria. Similar conclusions were drawn by Punt et al (2002) based on age-structured models and by Punt (2003) based on a size-structured model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The common-held belief that the ratio of the current stock size to the stock size in some historical year is estimated more robustly than recent stock size in absolute terms (e.g., Punt 1989;Punt et al 2002) was therefore not supported for rock lobster off Victoria. Similar conclusions were drawn by Punt et al (2002) based on age-structured models and by Punt (2003) based on a size-structured model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This statistic has been used in several previous evaluations of estimator performance (e.g. Punt, 2003b;Wilberg and Bence, 2006).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are assumed to be measured without error. No errors are assumed between the boundaries used for stock assessment and the true boundaries among the stocks, although this could be examined in future using the methods of Punt et al (1995) and Punt (2003). Once the data have been generated, they are analyzed using the stock assessment component of the management strategy and then by its decision rule component.…”
Section: The Operating Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%