EngOpt 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Optimization 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97773-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance of a Modified Harmony Search Algorithm in the Structural Identification and Damage Detection of a Scaled Offshore Wind Turbine Laboratory Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent optimization studies such as [20] and [21] show that HS is a superior optimization algorithm with promising potential. The gradient-free nature of the HS algorithm enabled it to achieve satisfying results even for the most complex optimization problems, such as structural identification and damage detection [22][23][24]. Thus, an improved version of the harmony search algorithm was chosen in this study.…”
Section: The Harmony Search Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent optimization studies such as [20] and [21] show that HS is a superior optimization algorithm with promising potential. The gradient-free nature of the HS algorithm enabled it to achieve satisfying results even for the most complex optimization problems, such as structural identification and damage detection [22][23][24]. Thus, an improved version of the harmony search algorithm was chosen in this study.…”
Section: The Harmony Search Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization algorithms were successful in many aspects related to civil engineering problems. A modified version of the harmony search algorithm was used in (Jahjouh and Nackenhorst, 2016b) to identify damage in a wind turbine structure. The optimal design of trusses using a hybrid version of particle swarm optimization, ray optimization and harmony search (HRPSO) was presented in (Kaveh and Javadi, 2014b) and compared to other metaheuristic algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Truss structures were also optimized using a hybridized particle swarm optimizer, ant colony and harmony search in (Kaveh and Talatahari, 2009). Other optimization algorithm applications can be found in (Kaveh and Abadi, 2010;Kaveh and Shakouri, 2010;Kaveh and Ahangaran, 2012;Jahjouh et al, 2013;Jahjouh, 2022b;Jahjouh and Nackenhorst, 2016a;Jahjouh, 2022a;Jahjouh and Nackenhorst, 2015;Alghamri et al, 2022;Jahjouh and Rolfes, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid survey of the optimization literature produced over the last 15 years reveals that GA [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62], DE [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75], SA [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97], HS [98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,…”
Section: Introduction and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%