2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12132133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Identification of Materials and Structures with Optical Methods and Metaheuristic Optimization

Abstract: This study presents a hybrid framework for mechanical identification of materials and structures. The inverse problem is solved by combining experimental measurements performed by optical methods and non-linear optimization using metaheuristic algorithms. In particular, we develop three advanced formulations of Simulated Annealing (SA), Harmony Search (HS) and Big Bang-Big Crunch (BBBC) including enhanced approximate line search and computationally cheap gradient evaluation strategies. The rationale behind the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(259 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ficarella et al [21] proposed the robot's optimum trajectory planning in joint space via the five-order polynomial function for a 6-DOF robot. In that paper, for the robot optimum trajectory planning, the hybrid real code population based on incremental learning and DE was used based on the two objective functions of minimizing trajectory time and jerk under kinematic constraints of all joints.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ficarella et al [21] proposed the robot's optimum trajectory planning in joint space via the five-order polynomial function for a 6-DOF robot. In that paper, for the robot optimum trajectory planning, the hybrid real code population based on incremental learning and DE was used based on the two objective functions of minimizing trajectory time and jerk under kinematic constraints of all joints.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blooming of metaheuristic methods favored by their inherent ability of finding global optima (or at least nearly global optimum solutions) as well as by the exponentially increasing computational power has led many researchers to use these algorithms in inverse problems. A comprehensive literature survey on applications of metaheuristic algorithms to mechanical characterization of materials is given in [27]. The interpretation of structural engineering from the perspective of inverse problems and the role played by metaheuristic algorithms and artificial intelligence in such a context are thoroughly reviewed in [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group two includes evolutionary algorithms involving mutation and crossover operations; a few methods in this area include genetic algorithms [11], differential evolution [12], biogeography-based optimizers [13] and bat algorithms [14,15]. Group three includes physics-based techniques involving physical laws for optimization problem solutions; a few techniques in this area are Henry gas solubility optimization [16,17], the big bang-big crunch [18,19] and gravitational search algorithms [20,21]. The final group includes swarm intelligence-based techniques used for optimization solutions; a few methods in this area are particle swarm optimization [22,23], artificial bee colonies [24,25], cuckoo searches [26,27], the marine predators algorithm [28,29] and the slime mold algorithm [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%