2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pentacyclic triterpene Lupeol switches M1 macrophages to M2 and ameliorates experimental inflammatory bowel disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…IRF-5 protein, which promotes M1 polarization, was significantly reduced via inhibition of p38 MAPK phosphorylation. It was suggested that soluble factors that are released by M1 macrophages were responsible for disruption of epithelial integrity by reducing ZO-1 (Zonula occludens-1) expression, with the effect being reversed by Lupeol [41]. …”
Section: Role Of Macrophages In Intestinal and Colorectal Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRF-5 protein, which promotes M1 polarization, was significantly reduced via inhibition of p38 MAPK phosphorylation. It was suggested that soluble factors that are released by M1 macrophages were responsible for disruption of epithelial integrity by reducing ZO-1 (Zonula occludens-1) expression, with the effect being reversed by Lupeol [41]. …”
Section: Role Of Macrophages In Intestinal and Colorectal Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al [32] suggest that disequilibrium of macrophage subpopulations promotes colitis development. Besides, either switching M1 to M2 macrophages or transfer of M2 macrophages ameliorates experimental colitis [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-polarization of macrophages is a key role and a promising therapeutic option in many diseases (26, 82). For example, inflammatory bowel diseases can be ameliorated by switching M1 macrophages to M2 (83, 84). Conversion of M2 to M1 phenotype is a potential therapeutic intervention in anti-tumor (85, 86).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%