1993
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.49.2.302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pedagogical Needs of Low Achievers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above, virtually all the previous related research has been based almost exclusively on French, German, and Spanish (languages of Groups I and 11 difficulty, according to the Foreign Service Institute classification), on students studylng only one of those languages (e.g., Holmquist 1993), or on students of a certain type (e.g., minority students [Davis & Markham 19911, low achievers [Wigzell and Al-Ansari 19931, or gifted students [Carlson 19811). Research in this area involving less commonly taught languages has tended to focus on foreign nationals studying English in their own countries or in the United States (e.g., Wigzell and Al-Ansari 1993). Even among students of more commonly taught languages there may, in fact, exist significant differences in attitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, virtually all the previous related research has been based almost exclusively on French, German, and Spanish (languages of Groups I and 11 difficulty, according to the Foreign Service Institute classification), on students studylng only one of those languages (e.g., Holmquist 1993), or on students of a certain type (e.g., minority students [Davis & Markham 19911, low achievers [Wigzell and Al-Ansari 19931, or gifted students [Carlson 19811). Research in this area involving less commonly taught languages has tended to focus on foreign nationals studying English in their own countries or in the United States (e.g., Wigzell and Al-Ansari 1993). Even among students of more commonly taught languages there may, in fact, exist significant differences in attitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such corequisite models have had some documented successes, this approach essentially necessitates that all support occurs exclusively during supplemental course time, since at-risk and non-at-risk students enroll in the same lecture portion of the course. Instructors may elect not to incorporate support in these mixed settings under the assumption that the majority of students may find it superfluous or unnecessary. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%