2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The path of technological progress for China's low-carbon development: Evidence from three urban agglomerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result shows that under the low-carbon development requirements, the economy has gradually decoupled from energy consumption. The path of technical progress is highly related to the economy, agreed to Kang et al [41], and its contribution rate has increased from 0.30% to 0.44%. It shows that the more economically developed, more funds can be introduced to develop new technologies, use energy-saving machines, which can reduce carbon emissions fundamentally.…”
Section: Comparison Of Base Development Scenario and Low Carbon Scenariomentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This result shows that under the low-carbon development requirements, the economy has gradually decoupled from energy consumption. The path of technical progress is highly related to the economy, agreed to Kang et al [41], and its contribution rate has increased from 0.30% to 0.44%. It shows that the more economically developed, more funds can be introduced to develop new technologies, use energy-saving machines, which can reduce carbon emissions fundamentally.…”
Section: Comparison Of Base Development Scenario and Low Carbon Scenariomentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As for technological innovation, which is also called technological progress, scholars have conducted many studies about its impact on carbon emissions from different aspects. For example, Kang et al [17] explored the various impacts of different sources of technological progress (including R&D, FDI and international trade) on the low-carbon development based on the panel data of 50 cities across the year of 2005-2014 in China's three urban agglomerations. Wang et al [18] employed patent data to measure technological progress and identified its heterogeneous influence on carbon emissions in different economic sectors of China using the panel data of 289 Chinese cities.…”
Section: Literature Review a The Effect Of Technological Innovatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each system-forming area has a key indicator, which is characterized by both the current state (static) and the indicator of its change (dynamic). For energy, the main sign from the green growth point of view is to determine energy intensity Golubetskaya [30], Porfiriev [31], Andreas, Burns, Touza [32], Kang, Li, Qu [33], and in this interpretation it should be considered with renewable and non-renewable sources. Similarly, in "transport" subsystem, detailing the indicators and focusing on the electric and other more ecological drive are not necessary, as the most important indicator is not actually the transition to a new drive, but the emissions and waste from technical operation.…”
Section: Second Level Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%