18th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS'06)
DOI: 10.1109/ecrts.2006.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Partitioned Scheduling of Sporadic Tasks According to Static-Priorities

Abstract: A polynomial-time algorithm is presented for partitioning a collection of sporadic tasks among the processors of an identical multiprocessor platform with static-priority scheduling on each individual processor. Since the partitioning problem is easily seen to be NP-hard in the strong sense, this algorithm is not optimal. A quantitative characterization of its worst-case performance is provided in terms of sufficient conditions and resource augmentation approximation bounds. The partitioning algorithm is also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same decomposition described in Section III, we now derive a resource augmentation bound required to schedule task sets under FBB-FFD (Fisher Baruah BakerFirst-Fit Decreasing) partitioned Deadline Monotonic (DM) scheduling [10] which the previous work on parallel task scheduling [4] uses as its underlying scheduling strategy. However, as was explained earlier, we consider a more general task model and a different task decomposition strategy, and are able to obtain a resource augmentation bound of 5 as shown below.…”
Section: Partitioned Deadline Monotonic Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the same decomposition described in Section III, we now derive a resource augmentation bound required to schedule task sets under FBB-FFD (Fisher Baruah BakerFirst-Fit Decreasing) partitioned Deadline Monotonic (DM) scheduling [10] which the previous work on parallel task scheduling [4] uses as its underlying scheduling strategy. However, as was explained earlier, we consider a more general task model and a different task decomposition strategy, and are able to obtain a resource augmentation bound of 5 as shown below.…”
Section: Partitioned Deadline Monotonic Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: According to [10], any constrained deadline sporadic task set π with total utilization u sum (π), maximum density δ max (π), and load λ(π) is schedulable by FBB-FFD on m unit-capacity processors if…”
Section: Partitioned Deadline Monotonic Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the traditional partitioning approaches [13,25,18,6,14], DM-PM assigns each task to a particular processor, according to kinds of bin-packing heuristics, upon which the schedulable condition for DM is satisfied. In fact, any heuristics are available for DM-PM.…”
Section: Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most partitioning algorithms [13,25,18,14] do, each task is assigned to the first processor upon which a schedulable condition is satisfied. The schedulable condition of T i for P k here is defined by…”
Section: Execution Capacity Of Shared Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], the authors introduced the Task Stretch Transformation (TST) model for parallel synchronous tasks that follow a fork-join structure. The TST considers preemptive fixed-priority periodic tasks with implicit deadlines partitioned according to the Fisher-Baruah-Baker First-Fit-Decreasing (FBB-FFD) [6] algorithm. Similarly, the Segment Stretch Transformation (SST) model was introduced in [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%